๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Different methods for estimating thermal diffusivity of a heat process

โœ Scribed by B. Leden; M.H. Hamza; M.A. Sheirah


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1976
Tongue
English
Weight
1000 KB
Volume
12
Category
Article
ISSN
0005-1098

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Compared to the widespread and highly accurate a~ngstr~m's 1861 method for determining the thermal ditusivity of a long copper rod the maximum likelihood method provides greater accuracy but more computational time and storage.

Summary---The purpose of this study is to compare three different methods for determining the thermal diffusivity of a one dimensional heat diffusion process. A modified ]U~ttr6m's method, an on-line least squares method and a maximum h]telihood method have been applied to data obtained from experiments on a long copper rod. The accuracy, the amount of computation, the storage capacity and in general the advantages and the limitations of the different methods are discussed.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A MODIFIED FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD FOR
โœ H. X. ZHANG; P. W. WEBB ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 602 KB

A time domain unconditionally stable explicit method is presented which may be used to model processes governed by the diffusion equation such as transient heat flow. Unlike the explicit finite difference routine, the method models the diffusion process within the time step (MPWT). Being explicit, t

A finite difference method for measuring
โœ J. D. Coleman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 298 KB

A method is devised for measuring soil thermal diffusivity in situ. It is based on direct experimental simulation of the finite difference approximation to the one-dimensional heat conduction equation. The method does not require the soil to be homogeneous except between the three thermometers that