Different measures of molecular mobility: Comparison between calorimetric and thermally stimulated current relaxation times below Tg and correlation with dielectric relaxation times above Tg
✍ Scribed by Chandan Bhugra; Rama Shmeis; Steven L. Krill; Michael J. Pikal
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 246 KB
- Volume
- 97
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-3549
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Stability of the amorphous state has been linked to molecular mobility of the matrix; however different techniques may capture different mobility substates. Our previous work suggested that two calorimetric techniques, Isothermal Microcalorimetry (TAM) and MDSC, measured different aspects of mobility with TAM measuring, in part, some faster modes of relaxation in addition to the modes mobilized at T(g). The aim of this work is to compare the relaxation times obtained using Thermally Stimulated Depolarization Current Spectroscopy (TSDC) with calorimetric mobility measured below T(g) and to determine if all measures of relaxation times below T(g) are consistent with relaxation times obtained above T(g) using Dielectric Spectroscopy (DRS). Model compounds were indomethacin, ketoconazole, nifedipine, flopropione, felodipine. For all compounds, relaxation times obtained using Thermal Windowing-TSDC technique below T(g) correlated well with relaxation times (tau) obtained above T(g) by DRS. At any given temperature below T(g), relaxation times measured depended upon the technique used and were in the following order TSDC < TAM < MDSC (tau). TSDC captures some faster relaxations not measured by calorimetric techniques, and therefore, different techniques give different measures of relaxation times below T(g). This information is important in understanding the relationships between mobility in the glassy solid and pharmaceutical stability.