๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Differences in portal hemodynamics between whole liver transplantation and living donor liver transplantation

โœ Scribed by Shui-Ming Jiang; Qi-Shun Zhang; Guang-Wen Zhou; Shi-Feng Huang; Hai-Ming Lu; Cheng-Hong Peng


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
253 KB
Volume
16
Category
Article
ISSN
1527-6465

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in portal hemodynamics between whole liver transplantation and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Twenty patients who underwent LDLT (the L group) and 42 patients who underwent whole liver transplantation (the W group) were enrolled, and colored Doppler ultrasonography was performed preoperatively and on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, 5, 7, 30, and 90. The changes in the portal blood flow velocity (PBV) and portal blood flow volume (PBF) were monitored. The graft and spleen sizes were measured with angiographic computed tomography, and upper endoscopy was used to measure esophageal varices on PODs 14, 30, and 90. Although the portal venous pressure (PVP) decreased after graft implantation, it was higher in the L group with a smaller graft size ratio (25.7 6 5.1 cm H 2 O for the L group and 18.5 6 4.6 cm H 2 O for the W group, P < 0.05). PBF and PBV increased in both the W and L groups on POD 1 after transplantation; however, the PBF and PBV peaks were significantly higher in the W group. The postoperative PVP and graft volume were greatly related to PBF on POD 1. Grafts in the L group regenerated rapidly after the operation, and the volume increased from 704 6 115 to 1524 6 281 mL as early as 1 month after transplantation. A rapid improvement in splenomegaly was observed in both groups. An improvement in esophageal varices was observed in the W group on POD 14 after transplantation, whereas no change was observed in the L group. The portal venous flow in patients with portal hypertension showed a high perfusion state after LDLT, but in contrast to whole liver transplantation, the PVP elevation after LDLT postponed the closing time of the collateral circulation and affected the recovery from splenomegaly.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Living donor liver transplantation
โœ S. A. White; S. G. Pollard ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 58 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views
Role of splanchnic hemodynamics in liver
โœ Shui-Ming Jiang; Guang-Wen Zhou; Rui Zhang; Cheng-Hong Peng; Ji-Qi Yan; Liang Wa ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2009 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 269 KB

The aim of this study was to investigate the changes in splanchnic hemodynamics after LDLT and their relationship with graft regeneration. Eighteen patients with LDLT December 2006 and June 2008 were enrolled, and color Doppler ultrasonography was performed preoperatively and on postoperative days (

Donor safety in living donor liver trans
โœ Sheung-Tat Fan ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 18 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

We read with great concern the recent provocative editorial on living related liver transplantation. 1 It raises important issues about the safety of the procedure for the donor. Dr Strong mentions that he ''is aware of at least 6 deaths'' that have occurred with the procedure. Only 1 death has appa

Donor safety and remnant liver volume in
โœ C. Burcin Taner; Murat Dayangac; Baris Akin; Deniz Balci; Suleyman Uraz; Cihan D ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 88 KB

Living donor liver transplantation is now a common practice in countries in which the availability of cadaveric organs is limited. The preoperative preparation, intraoperative surgical technique, and postoperative care of donors and recipients have evolved in recent years. We retrospectively compare