𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Differences in Forest Stand Structure Between Forest Ownership Groups in Central Finland

✍ Scribed by Matti Maltamo; Janne Uuttera; Kullervo Kuusela


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
303 KB
Volume
51
Category
Article
ISSN
0301-4797

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The comparisons between the ownership groups were made according to forest site types and stages of stand development. The stand structure variables used were: the range of tree diameter distribution, the number of tree storeys and the number of tree species. The number of tree storeys was estimated from the diameter distribution using non-parametric kernel smoothing.

The differences between the forest ownership groups were considerable. On moist heaths the forests in private ownership had a greater number of tree storeys and greater diameter range compared to those forests owned by forest industrial companies or by the state. On the dryish and dry heaths similar differences occurred in the number of tree species. Information on the state of forests based on large-scale inventory data is a valuable tool for the development of forest management, regional forest management planning and even large-scale ecological planning. In the future, variables, such as those presented and compared in this study, could also be used for monitoring the state of forest management and for forest product certification.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Patterns of covariance between forest st
✍ Michael A. Lefsky; Andrew T. Hudak; Warren B. Cohen; S.A. Acker πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 249 KB

In the past decade, lidar (light detection and ranging) has emerged as a powerful tool for remotely sensing forest canopy and stand structure, including the estimation of aboveground biomass and carbon storage. Numerous papers have documented the use of lidar measurements to predict important aspect