The aim of this study was to examine aggression responses (Buss aggression paradigm) of type A and type B males under two dBerent kinds of evaluative instructions. Extreme groups of type A and type B college-age males were each subdivided into two groups receiving different sets of instructions befo
Differences in anger, hostility, and interpersonal aggressiveness in type A and type B adolescents
β Scribed by Eugene W. Farber; Katherine Burge-Callaway
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 76 KB
- Volume
- 54
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0021-9762
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
This study investigated self-reported anger, hostility, interpersonal aggressiveness, and self-confidence in 19 Type A and 11 Type B adolescent boys ages 15 and 16. It was hypothesized that Type As would report greater trait anger and aggressiveness, less confidence in interpersonal relating, and would endorse a pattern of expression of anger and aggressiveness that would differ from Type Bs. No significant differences were found between Type As and Type Bs on measures of global anger and aggressiveness, and no significant relationship between interpersonal hostility and self-confidence was demonstrated. Type As, however, were found to be more likely than Type Bs to report that they lose their temper and that they act in physically aggressive, verbally aggressive, and passive aggressive ways. Results were discussed in terms of the similarity of this pattern in Type A adolescent boys to that described for adult Type A men.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract We looked for evidence supporting the hypothesis that girls are more indirectly aggressive than boys by 1) comparing the average scores of girls and boys on the Direct Indirect Aggression Scales [BjΓΆrkqvist et al., 1992b], and 2) by comparing the distributions of boys and girls in five
This study focuses on outpatient behavioral management of oppositional-defiant teenagers that engage in aggressive behaviors. Sixteen subjects, 13 male and three female, are followed through an alternating treatment, single case design, ABCD: baseline; cognitive therapy coupled with the REST (Real E