✦ LIBER ✦

Diagnostic Writing Assessment: The Development and Validation of a Rating Scale by KNOCH, UTE

✍ Scribed by ALISTER CUMMING

Book ID: 109163036
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2011
Tongue: English
Weight: 330 KB
Volume: 95
Category: Article
ISSN: 0026-7902
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01212_19.x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The assessment of emotional reactivity:

The assessment of emotional reactivity: A scale development and validation study

✍ Charles R. Carlson; Frank L. Collins; Jean F. Stewart; James Porzelius; Jeffrey 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 657 KB

The behavior intervention rating scale:

The behavior intervention rating scale: Development and validation of a pretreatment acceptability and effectiveness measure

✍ Stephen N. Elliott; Mary Von Brock Treuting 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 572 KB

Rating Scales for the Assessment of Empa

Rating Scales for the Assessment of Empathic Communication in Medical Interviews (REM): Scale Development, Reliability, and Validity

✍ Jennifer Nicolai; Ralf Demmel; Jutta Hagen 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 219 KB

Development and validation of a scale to

Development and validation of a scale to assess social support in the postpartum period

✍ J. Hopkins; S. B. Campbell 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Springer Vienna 🌐 English ⚖ 85 KB

Cross-cultural reliability and validity

Cross-cultural reliability and validity of ADHD assessed by the ADHD Rating Scale in a pan-European study

✍ Manfred Döpfner; Hans-Christoph Steinhausen; David Coghill; Søren Dalsgaard; Lyn 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 262 KB

Development and validation of a new figu

Development and validation of a new figural drawing scale for body-image assessment: the BIAS-BD

✍ Rick M. Gardner; Leah M. Jappe; Lisa Gardner 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 130 KB

## Abstract This study describes the development and validation of a new and improved body‐image assessment tool, the BIAS‐BD, based on known body dimensions. The scale's construction consisted of 17 male and 17 female contour‐line drawings that used known anthropometric body dimensions of shoulder