Cale `s1,2 and multicentric groups from SNIFF 32, VINDIAG 7, and ANRS/HC/EP23 FIBROSTAR studies The sequential algorithm for fibrosis evaluation (SAFE) and the Bordeaux algorithm (BA), which cross-check FibroTest with the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) or FibroScan, are v
Diagnostic algorithms for liver fibrosis in hepatitis C: Are they ready to avoid liver biopsy?
β Scribed by Giada Sebastiani; Alfredo Alberti
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2012
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 196 KB
- Volume
- 55
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-9139
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
We read with interest the article by Khalili et al. 1 addressing the management of small liver nodules detected in patients with cirrhosis under surveillance with abdominal ultrasound (US) that gave indeterminate results by contrast imaging. To optimize American Association for the Study of the Liver Disease (AASLD) guidelines, 2 the authors suggest performing a fine-needle biopsy examination of nodules showing either arterial hypervascularity on computed tomography (CT) / magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or accompanied by a synchronous hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) only, since these were the only independent variables associated with malignancy in their retrospective study. According to this algorithm, approximately 20% of additional tumors will be identified, with a sensitivity of 62%, a specificity of 79%, and a 73% save of liver biopsies.
When we applied this algorithm to our patients with a de novo liver nodule prospectively detected during surveillance 3 (Fig. 1), the corresponding figures were 44% for sensitivity and 55% for specificity, with a positive predictive value of 44% and a negative predictive value of 55%, respectively. Overall, among 36 1-2 cm indeterminate nodules the modified algorithm would have diagnosed 7 (44%) of tumors only of the 16 identified by histology, including 15 HCC and 1 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). At the same time, the diagnosis of HCC would have been significantly delayed in nine (56%) patients compared with none if treated according to AASLD guidelines. The fact that the majority (75%) of delayed diagnoses were in patients with a very early HCC, i.e., the ideal candidates for radical treatment with local ablation, 4 attenuates the appeal of the modified algorithm, which in addition would have also led to a misdiagnosis of ICC in one nodule devoid of contrast uptake during the arterial phase of CT/MRI. Due to the high incidence of HCC in patients with compensated cirrhosis and the low risk of liver biopsy complications, we strongly endorse unmodified AASLD guidelines for the management of patients with cirrhosis with 1-2 cm liver nodules with undefined radiological diagnosis.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES