𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Diagnosis of cirrhosis with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone and in combination: Preliminary experience

✍ Scribed by Jignesh Patel; Eric E. Sigmund; Henry Rusinek; Marcel Oei; James S. Babb; Bachir Taouli


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
577 KB
Volume
31
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Purpose:

To report our preliminary experience with the use of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW‐MRI) and dynamic contrast‐enhanced (DCE)‐MRI alone and in combination for the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis.

Materials and Methods:

Thirty subjects (16 with noncirrhotic liver, 14 with cirrhosis) were prospectively assessed with IVIM DW‐MRI (n = 27) and DCE‐MRI (n = 20). IVIM parameters included perfusion fraction (PF), pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*), true diffusion coefficient (D), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Model‐free DCE‐MR parameters included time to peak (TTP), upslope, and initial area under the curve at 60 seconds (IAUC60). A dual input single compartmental perfusion model yielded arterial flow (Fa), portal venous flow (Fp), arterial fraction (ART), mean transit time (MTT), and distribution volume (DV). The diagnostic performances for diagnosis of cirrhosis were evaluated for each modality alone and in combination using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses. IVIM and DCE‐MR parameters were compared using a generalized estimating equations model.

Results:

PF, D*, D, and ADC values were significantly lower in cirrhosis (P = 0.0056–0.0377), whereas TTP, DV, and MTT were significantly increased in cirrhosis (P = 0.0006–0.0154). There was no correlation between IVIM‐ and DCE‐MRI parameters. The highest Az (areas under the curves) values were observed for ADC (0.808) and TTP‐DV (0.952 for each). The combination of ADC with DV and TTP provided 84.6% sensitivity and 100% specificity for diagnosis of cirrhosis.

Conclusion:

The combination of DW‐MRI and DCE‐MRI provides an accurate diagnosis of cirrhosis. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;31:589–600. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Prostate cancer detection with 3 T MRI:
✍ Kazuhiro Kitajima; Yasushi Kaji; Yoshitatsu Fukabori; Ken-ichiro Yoshida; Narufu 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 198 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract ## Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic ability of diffusion‐weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast‐enhanced imaging (DCEI) in combination with T2‐weighted imaging (T2WI) for the detection of prostate cancer using 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with a phased‐array body coil.

Added value of breathhold diffusion-weig
✍ Peng-Ju Xu; Fu-Hua Yan; Jian-Hua Wang; Jiang Lin; Yuan Ji 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 660 KB

## Abstract ## Purpose To evaluate the added value of single‐breathhold diffusion‐weighted MRI (DWI) in detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) lesions (≤2 cm) in patients with chronic liver disease, by comparing the detection sensitivity of combined DWI/conventional dynamic contrast‐enh