Diagnosis of acute lower limb deep venous thrombosis with ultrasound: Trends and controversies
✍ Scribed by Dauzat, Michel; Laroche, Jean-Pierre; Deklunder, Ghislaine; Ayoub, Jean; Quéré, Isabelle; Lopez, François-Michel; Janbon, Charles
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1997
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 548 KB
- Volume
- 25
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0091-2751
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Acute deep venous thrombosis of the lower limb is a common and threatening condition whose clinical diagnosis is known to be unreliable. Sonography has gradually superseded venography as the primary diagnostic procedure. A review of the medical literature shows that sonography offers a high level of sensitivity and specificity in symptomatic patients but suffers from a lack of sensitivity at the calf level and in asymptomatic patients. Technologic progress, as well as increased operator experience, may improve sensitivity. Nevertheless, several critical issues remain unresolved, such as the significance of free-floating thrombi, the usefulness of calf and bilateral examination, the criteria that are essential to the diagnosis, the risk of compression sonography, and sonography's role in the direct detection of venous emboli.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Ninety‐eight legs in 73 patients were evaluated with image‐directed Doppler ultrasound for suspected chronic venous insufficiency. Examinations of the entire venous system were performed to determine lumen patency and valvular competence. Reflux during Valsalva maneuver in the femoral a
Purpose. We conducted this study to assess the progression or regression of venous thrombi during and after treatment and to search for criteria of embolism risk. Methods. We prospectively studied 75 patients with lower limb deep venous thrombosis. We used B-mode sonography for the diagnosis and fo
Duplex and color Doppler sonography (DUS) is currently the technique of choice for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in symptomatic patients, because it has proven safe and cost-effective, with a very high sensitivity and specificity (96% and 98%, respectively) for the diagnosis of proxi