𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Developments in asbestos cancer risk assessment

✍ Scribed by Michael A. Silverstein; Laura S. Welch; Richard Lemen


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
115 KB
Volume
52
Category
Article
ISSN
0271-3586

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Background

Efforts have been made for 25 years to develop asbestos risk assessments that provide valid information about workplace and community cancer risks. Mathematical models have been applied to a group of workplace epidemiology studies to describe the relationships between exposure and risk. EPA's most recent proposed method was presented at a public meeting in July 2008.

Methods

Risk assessments prepared by USEPA, OSHA, and NIOSH since 1972 were reviewed, along with related literature.

Results and Conclusions

None of the efforts to use statistical models to characterize relative cancer potencies for asbestos fiber types and sizes have been able to overcome limitations of the exposure data. Resulting uncertainties have been so great that these estimates should not be used to drive occupational and environmental health policy. The EPA has now rejected and discontinued work on its proposed methods for estimating potency factors. Future efforts will require new methods and more precise and reliable exposure assessments. However, while there may be genuine need for such work, a more pressing priority with regard to the six regulated forms of asbestos and other asbestiform fibers is to ban their production and use. Am. J. Ind. Med. 52:850–858, 2009. Β© 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Smoking intervention in subjects at risk
✍ Halfrid P. Waage; Lars J. Vatten; Einar Opedal; BjΓΈrn Hilt πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 81 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

A smoking intervention counseling program was applied among asbestos-exposed male smokers younger than 65 years of age to examine the effect of an intervention based on risk communication. Intervention subjects (n 5 431) were invited to a health status checkup combined with physician-delivered smoki