Development of an evidence-based review with recommendations using an online iterative process
✍ Scribed by Luke Rudmik; Timothy L. Smith
- Publisher
- Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 255 KB
- Volume
- 1
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 2042-6976
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Background:
The practice of modern medicine is governed by evidence‐based principles. Due to the plethora of medical literature, clinicians often rely on systematic reviews and clinical guidelines to summarize the evidence and provide best practices. Implementation of an evidence‐based clinical approach can minimize variation in health care delivery and optimize the quality of patient care.
Methods:
This article reports a method for developing an “Evidence‐based Review with Recommendations” using an online iterative process. The manuscript describes the following steps involved in this process: Clinical topic selection, Evidence‐hased review assignment, Literature review and initial manuscript preparation, Iterative review process with author selection, and Manuscript finalization.
Results:
The goal of this article is to improve efficiency and increase the production of evidence‐based reviews while maintaining the high quality and transparency associated with the rigorous methodology utilized for clinical guideline development.
Conclusion:
With the rise of evidence‐based medicine, most medical and surgical specialties have an abundance of clinical topics which would benefit from a formal evidence‐based review. Although clinical guideline development is an important methodology, the associated challenges limit development to only the absolute highest priority clinical topics. As outlined in this article, the online iterative approach to the development of an Evidence‐based Review with Recommendations may improve productivity without compromising the quality associated with formal guideline development methodology. © 2011 ARS‐AAOA, LLC.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract This is an evidence‐based review of electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing of patients with suspected lumbosacral radiculopathy to determine its utility in diagnosis and prognosis. Literature searches were performed to identify articles applying EDX techniques to patients with suspected lumbos
## Abstract This evidence‐based review was performed to evaluate the utility of nerve conduction studies (NCSs) and needle electromyography (EMG) in the diagnosis of tibial neuropathy at the ankle (tarsal tunnel syndrome, TTS). A total of 317 articles on TTS were identified that were published in E
## Abstract ## Objectives Main objectives were to familiarize the reader with a theoretical framework for modifying evidence‐based interventions for cultural groups, and to provide an example of one method, Formative Method for Adapting Psychotherapies (FMAP), in the adaptation of an evidence‐base
The Quality Standards Subcommittee (QSS) of the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) is charged with developing practice parameters for physicians. This evidence-based review addresses some of the major management issues in patients with ALS, and highlights the many areas in which more research is ne