✦ LIBER ✦

Development of a Wireless Sensor Glove for Surgical Skills Assessment

✍ Scribed by King, R.C.; Atallah, L.; Lo, B.; Guang-Zhong Yang

Book ID: 114643821
Publisher: IEEE
Year: 2009
Tongue: English
Weight: 495 KB
Volume: 13
Category: Article
ISSN: 1089-7771
DOI: 10.1109/titb.2009.2029614

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Development of a comprehensive vascular

Development of a comprehensive vascular skills assessment for surgical trainees

✍ Ravindar S. Sidhu; Jerry Chen; Keith Baxter; Hao Wu 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 493 KB

Developing a system for the continuous a

Developing a system for the continuous assessment of practical nursing skills

✍ P Aggleton; M Allen; S Montgomery 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 657 KB

Development and evaluation of a decision

Development and evaluation of a decision-based simulation for assessment of team skills

✍ Andrew, Brandon; Plachta, Stephen; Salud, Lawrence; Pugh, Carla M. 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 304 KB

Using Objective Structured Assessment of

Using Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills to Evaluate a Basic Skills Simulation Curriculum for First-Year Surgical Residents

✍ Jeffrey G. Chipman; Constance C. Schmitz 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 242 KB

Development of An Assessment Tool to Mea

Development of An Assessment Tool to Measure Technical Skills for NOTES®

✍ Melina C. Vassiliou; Daniel T. McKenna; Pepa A. Kaneva; Per-Ola Park; Paul Swain 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 65 KB

The development of a multirater instrume

The development of a multirater instrument for assessing employee problem-solving skill

✍ Margaret C. Lohman 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 124 KB

## Abstract This study was an exploratory investigation of the development of a multirater instrument to measure employee problem‐solving skill. The instrument consisted of two parallel forms: an employee self‐assessment and a supervisory assessment. For the self‐assessment, twenty employees rated