๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Development ethics, capabilities and the work of W.I.D.E.R.

โœ Scribed by DES GASPER


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
61 KB
Volume
9
Category
Article
ISSN
0954-1748

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


A central set of questions in development ethics asks: what do and should we mean by social improvement', development' in a normative sense, human well-being and quality of life? A second central theme concerns: how far can we progress on these issues if talking on a global scale, and how far are answers culturally speciยฎc?

Work since the late 1970s on the capabilities (or capability) approach (CA), formalized by the Indian economist and philosopher Amartya Sen, has much to oer on the nature of `development' and social improvement. UNDP has tried to draw on it in the Human Development Reports and its deยฎnition of development as enlargement of people's choices. From the mid-1980s new dimensions have been added to CA by the American moral philosopher and classicist Martha Nussbaum, working together with Sen but also deยฎning her own version. She has also faced the second theme above, the question of cultural relativity. This body of work centring on capabilities theory is the focus of the set of four papers that follows.

From its establishment in 1984ยฑ85 the Helsinki-based World Institute of Development Economics Research, part of the United Nations University, has promoted work in the spirit of its acronym: WIDER. Sen has exerted considerable inยฏuence. He, Stephen Marglin and other economists sensitive to philosophical limitations of mainstream development economics opened WIDER's research to face basic existential and ethical questions raised by development policies: meanings of development, the costs of conventional economic modernization and who bears them, the rights of women, and the legitimacy or illegitimacy of promoting views of well-being from one culture in other cultures. To enrich this research, WIDER has mingled economists with philosophers, anthropologists and others, at any rate from an elite circuit in American and British academe. Prominent examples are Nussbaum and the FrenchยฑAmerican cultural anthropologist Frederique Appfel Marglin. WIDER conferences in 1986, 1988, and 1991 have generated at a stately pace a series of major books: Marglin and Marglin (1990); and Nussbaum and Glover (1995). The volumes on The Quality of Life and Women, Culture, and Development consolidate work on the capabilities approach, and deserve special attention.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Proactive corporate environmental strate
โœ Sanjay Sharma; Harrie Vredenburg ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 126 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

This article presents the results of a study conducted in two phases within a single industry context. The first phase involved comparative case studies to ground the applicability of the resource-based view of the firm within the domain of environmental responsiveness. The second phase involved tes

The ethics of resigning
โœ J. Patrick Dobel ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 150 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Getting out or staying in marks a defining moment for a person in public life. Most decisions in office are woven into a fabric of habit, experience, and professional judgments. Only a few decisions threaten the fabric of integrity and can unravel a life or office. At these frayed edges of selfhood

HETEROGENEITY OF FIRM CAPABILITIES AND C
โœ MARIKO SAKAKIBARA ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 199 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

This article proposes capability heterogeneity of R&D consortia participants as a condition to distinguish two competing motives for cooperative R&D: cost-sharing vs. skill-sharing. An analysis of 398 questionnaire responses from participants in Japanese government-sponsored R&D consortia finds that