Development and validation of a case ascertainment tool for ankylosing spondylitis
β Scribed by Michael H. Weisman; Lan Chen; Daniel O. Clegg; John C. Davis Jr.; Robert W. Dubois; Pamela E. Prete; Laurie M. Savage; Laura Schafer; Maria E. Suarez-Almazor; Hsing-Ting Yu; John D. Reveille
- Publisher
- Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 152 KB
- Volume
- 62
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 2151-464X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Objective
Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) diagnosis is often delayed. The availability of effective biologic agents for treating AS has increased the importance of early diagnosis. We tested questions derived from a comprehensive literature review and an advisory board in a caseβcontrol study designed to identify patients with AS from among patients with chronic back pain (CBP).
Methods
Question items were cognitively tested among patients with AS, and then in caseβcontrol studies for validation and creation of a scoring algorithm and question item reduction. AS cases were recruited from a known database, and CBP subjects (controls) were recruited from clinics, employers, and from the SpineUniverse Web site. We used individual question items in a multivariate framework to discriminate between people with and without AS.
Results
Fortyβthree questions yielded 24 items for analyses; 12 of these were entered into a multivariate regression model. Individual items yielded odds ratios ranging from 0.07 to 30.31. Question items with a significant positive relationship to AS included male sex, neck or hip pain/stiffness, longer pain duration, decreased pain/stiffness with daily physical activity, pain relief within 48 hours of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and diagnosis of iritis. The tool demonstrated a sensitivity of 67.4 and a specificity of 94.6. The tool was developed from clinically and radiologically diagnosed AS cases and therefore is designed to distinguish AS cases among CBP subjects. In addition, βΌ54% of the AS cases in the study were treated with biologic agents, which may impact questionnaire responses.
Conclusion
This tool can identify undiagnosed patients with AS and, potentially, those at an earlier stage in their disease course.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract ## Objectives To define what expert clinicians consider a dramatic response in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients treated with biologic therapies based on patient and physician assessments of global disease activity. To compare this expert clinicianβderived criteria to the Ankylosing