✦ LIBER ✦

Development and Reliability Testing of the Clinical Pharmacist Recommendation Taxonomy

✍ Scribed by Dr. Angela B. Hoth; Dr. Barry L. Carter; Dr. Jose Ness; Dr. Anjan Bhattacharyya; Dr. Ronald I. Shorr; Dr. Gary E. Rosenthal; Dr. Peter J. Kaboli

Book ID: 115049525
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2007
Tongue: English
Weight: 142 KB
Volume: 27
Category: Article
ISSN: 0277-0008
DOI: 10.1592/phco.27.5.639

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Development and Reliability Testing of t

Development and Reliability Testing of the Childhood Feeding Experiences Survey

✍ Julie Schneider; Dawn Clifford; Michelle Neyman Morris; Natalie Mactavish; Ken L 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 51 KB

Development and Reliability Testing of t

Development and Reliability Testing of the Victoria Bowel Performance Scale (BPS)

✍ G. Michael Downing; Craig Kuziemsky; Mary Lesperance; Francis Lau; Ann Syme 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 240 KB

Review of the International Harmonisatio

Review of the International Harmonisation of Clinical Pathology testing (IHCPT) recommendations on study design and clinical pathology testing

✍ Davies, D. 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 358 KB

Development of the Hand Active Sensation

Development of the Hand Active Sensation Test: Reliability and Validity

✍ Petra S. Williams; D. Michele Basso; Jane Case-Smith; Deborah S. Nichols-Larsen 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 180 KB

The clinical autonomy of community pharm

The clinical autonomy of community pharmacists in England. 1. Designing and testing a survey instrument

✍ Peter Magirr; Mike Grimsley; Roger Ottewill; Peter Noyce 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 130 KB

The distal urethral electrical conductan

The distal urethral electrical conductance test: Standardisation of method and clinical reliability

✍ C. J. Mayne; P. Hilton 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 272 KB

Urethral electrical conductance was recorded throughout a standard exercise test in a group of 40 women with known urinary incontinence. Analysis of the results has shown it to be of little diagnostic value (sensitivity = 33%). It is, however, a sensitive means of detecting leakage (sensitivity = 97