✦ LIBER ✦

Developing methods for assessing quality of life in different cultural settings

✍ Scribed by SuzanneM. Skevington; Norman Sartorius; Marianne Amir; and The WHOQOL-Group1

Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 2004
Tongue: English
Weight: 252 KB
Volume: 39
Category: Article
ISSN: 1433-9285
DOI: 10.1007/s00127-004-0700-5

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Tr

Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Trials: Methods and Practice (second edition)

✍ M. Metz; Kathleen W. Wyrwich 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 127 KB

Short forms of subjective quality of lif

Short forms of subjective quality of life assessments from cross-cultural studies for use in surveys with different populations

✍ Holger Mühlan; Monika Bullinger; Mick Power; Silke Schmidt 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 101 KB

Development of Quality of Life Questionn

Development of Quality of Life Questionnaire in Japan: quality of life assessment of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

✍ Minoru Kurihara; Hiroyuki Shimizu; Koji Tsuboi; Kunihiko Kobayashi; Minoru Murak 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 97 KB 👁 2 views

Quality of life assessments with SF 36 i

Quality of life assessments with SF 36 in different musculoskeletal diseases

✍ Figen Yilmaz; Fusun Sahin; Ernur Ergoz; Emel Deniz; Cem Ercalik; Serap Dalgic Yu 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 115 KB

Assessment of quality of life in later l

Assessment of quality of life in later life: Development and validation of the QuiLL

✍ Sherrill Evans; Claire Gately; Peter Huxley; Alyson Smith; Sube Banerjee 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 266 KB

Comparison of different life-cycle impac

Comparison of different life-cycle impact assessment methods for aquatic ecotoxicity

✍ Carsten Schulze; Almut Jödicke; Martin Scheringer; Manuele Margni; Olivier Jolli 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 195 KB

## Abstract Human and ecotoxicity impact categories are problematic to quantify within life‐cycle impact assessment (LCIA) because their local scope makes them difficult to aggregate with the traditional global‐impact categories used in life‐cycle assessment (LCA). For being able to assess local im