<p><p>It is well over a decade since John Fischer and Mark Ravizza โ and before them, Jay Wallace and Daniel Dennett โ defended responsibility from the threat of determinism. But defending responsibility from determinism is a potentially endless and largely negative enterprise; it can go on for as l
Determinism, Free Will and Moral Responsibility
โ Scribed by Gerald Dworkin (Ed.)
- Publisher
- Prentice Hall
- Year
- 1970
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 225
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Table of Contents
INTRODUCTORY ESSAY 1
part one
WHAT IS DETERMINISM AND IS IT TRUE 11
DAVID HUME
Of Liberty and Necessity 13
C. S. PEIRCE
The Doctrine of Necessity Examined 33
ERNEST NAGEL
Determinism in History 49
part two
WHAT IS FREE WILL AND IS IT TRUE 83
THOMAS REID
Some Arguments for Free Will 85
C. A. CAMPBELL
Has the Self "Free Will"? 98
LORENZO DE VALLA
Dialogue on Free Will 111
CARL GINET
Can the Will be Caused? 119
part three
RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN DETERMINISM, FREE WILL AND MORAL RESPONSIBILITY 127
G. E. MOORE
Free Will 129
STEPHEN N. THOMAS
A Modal Muddle 141
C. D. BROAD
Determinism, Indeterminism, and Libertarianism 149
KEITH LEHRER
An Empirical Disproof of Determinism 172
J. J. C. SMART
Free Will, Praise and Blame 196
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL ESSAY 215
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Determinism is, roughly, the thesis that facts about the past and the laws of nature entail all truths. A venerable, age-old dilemma concerning responsibility distils to this: if either determinism is true or it is not true, we lack "responsibility-grounding" control. Either determinism is true or i
<p>This book examines the way in which new discoveries about genetic and neuroscience are influencing our understanding of human behaviour. As scientists unravel more about the ways in which genes and the environment work together to shape the development of our brains, their studies have importance
<P>Traditional philosophers approached the issues of free will and moral responsibility through conceptual analysis that seldom incorporated findings from empirical science. In recent decades, however, striking developments in psychology and neuroscience have captured the attention of many moral phi