𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Determination of the optimal model for end-stage liver disease score in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing loco-regional therapy

✍ Scribed by Teh-Ia Huo; Jaw-Ching Wu; Han-Chieh Lin; Fa-Yauh Lee; Ming-Chih Hou; Yi-Hsiang Huang; Pui-Ching Lee; Full-Young Chang; Shou-Dong Lee


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
100 KB
Volume
10
Category
Article
ISSN
1527-6465

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) has been a prevailing system to prioritize cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation. An "exceptional" MELD score of 20 and 24 points is assigned for stage T1 and T2 patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), respectively. However, this strategy is based on scarce data and the optimal score for these patients remains uncertain. We investigated 238 patients with small HCC who were candidates for liver transplantation and underwent arterial chemoembolization or percutaneous injection therapy using acetic acid or ethanol. Tumor stage (P = .001) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class (P < .001) were independent risk factors predicting tumor progression or death in survival analysis. The risk of disease progression in HCC patients stratified by tumor stage was mapped and equated with the risk of mortality of 456 cirrhotic patients without HCC. The 6- and 12-month rates of disease progression were 4% and 6%, respectively, for stage T1 HCC patients (n = 50; mean MELD: 9.5). These rates were close to and no higher than the mortality rate in MELD category 8-12 at the corresponding time period (7.1% and 11.3%, respectively; n = 141). For stage T2 patients (n = 188; mean MELD: 9.3), the corresponding rates were 5.3% and 13.8%, respectively, which were close to and no higher than the mortality rate in MELD category 10-14 (9.0% and 13.9%, respectively, n = 166). In conclusion, the risk of disease progression is quite low for selected HCC patients undergoing loco-regional therapy. A lower MELD score may be suggested to be equivalent to the risk of short- and mid-term mortality in the cirrhosis group.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The model for end-stage liver disease-ba
✍ Teh-Ia Huo; Han-Chieh Lin; Yi-Hsiang Huang; Jaw-Ching Wu; Jen-Huei Chiang; Pui-C πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 190 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The Japan Integrated Scoring (JIS) system was revealed as a better model for outcome prediction compared with the Cancer of Liver Italian Program system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and the Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) was better as a prognostic predict

Frequency and predictors of de novo hepa
✍ Carla W. Brady; Alastair D. Smith; Karen M. Stechuchak; Cynthia J. Coffman; Jane πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 104 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

In the current system of allocation, patients awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remain at risk of developing de novo hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and removal from the waiting list. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we calculated the rate and identified predictors o

Proposal of a modified Child-Turcotte-Pu
✍ Teh-Ia Huo; Han-Chieh Lin; Jaw-Ching Wu; Fa-Yauh Lee; Ming-Chih Hou; Pui-Ching L πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 224 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) has a better predictive accuracy for survival than the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) system and has been the primary reference for organ allocation in liver transplantation. The CTP system, with a score range of 5-15, has a ceiling effect that may compromise