## Abstract **Summary:** The crystal structure of syndiotactic 3,4‐poly(2‐methyl‐1,3‐butadiene) has been determined by the joint use of molecular mechanics and X‐ray diffraction. Molecular mechanics calculations have been performed both on the isolated chain and on the crystal by the use of various
Determination of the Crystal Structure of Isotactic cis-1,4-Poly(1,3-hexadiene) by X-Ray Diffraction and Molecular Mechanics
✍ Scribed by Beniamino Pirozzi; Roberto Napolitano; Giovangiuseppe Giusto; Giovanni Ricci
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 248 KB
- Volume
- 209
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1022-1352
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The crystal structure of isotactic cis‐1,4‐poly(1,3‐hexadiene) has been determined through a combination of X‐ray diffraction analysis and molecular mechanics. Two reasonable values for unit cell parameters were obtained from the fiber diffraction pattern of a well‐oriented sample. Energy maps performed on a molecular model of the polymer chain yielded an absolute minimum corresponding to a conformation having the internal parameters similar to those of an s(2/1) helical polymer chain. Packing energy minimizations performed for all the orthorhombic and monoclinic space groups having crystallographic s(2/1) chain symmetry indicate unequivocally that the best mode of packing is obtained for a crystal structure characterized by a unit cell with parameters a = 8.98 Å, b = 7.82 Å, and c = 8.10 Å in the __P__2~1~2~1~2~1~ space group. The calculated powder and fiber diffraction patterns of this structural model are in very good agreement with the experimental diffraction patterns. Similarities and differences with the crystal structures of isotactic cis‐1,4‐poly(1,3‐pentadiene) and isotactic cis‐1,4‐poly(2‐methyl‐1,3‐pentadiene) are discussed.
magnified image
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract **Summary:** A comparison between the crystal structure of isotactic __cis__‐1,4‐poly(1,3‐pentadiene) previously predicted by molecular mechanics calculations and that successively determined by other authors by experimental data is reported. The agreement between the two structures is
## Abstract The crystal structures of __cis__‐cyclodecene. 1/2 AgNO~3~ (monoclinic, __a__ = 5.329, __b__=14.53, __c__=27.17 Å, β=92.02°, space group __C__ 2/__c__) and of 1,1,4,4‐tetramethyl‐__cis__‐cyclodec‐7‐ene · 1/2 AgNO~3~ (orthorhombic, __a__=5.879, __b__=16.86, __c__=28.39 Å, space group __C