𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Detecting rare variant associations: methods for testing haplotypes and multiallelic genotypes

✍ Scribed by Rita M. Cantor; Marsha Wilcox


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
92 KB
Volume
35
Category
Article
ISSN
0741-0395

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

We summarize the work done by the contributors to Group 13 at Genetic Analysis Workshop 17 (GAW17) and provide a synthesis of their data analyses. The Group 13 contributors used a variety of approaches to test associations of both rare variants and common single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with the GAW17 simulated traits, implementing analytic methods that incorporate multiallelic genotypes and haplotypes. In addition to using a wide variety of statistical methods and approaches, the contributors exhibited a remarkable amount of flexibility and creativity in coding the variants and their genes and in evaluating their proposed approaches and methods. We describe and contrast their methods along three dimensions: (1) selection and coding of genetic entities for analysis, (2) method of analysis, and (3) evaluation of the results. The contributors consistently presented a strong rationale for using multiallelic analytic approaches. They indicated that power was likely to be increased by capturing the signals of multiple markers within genetic entities defined by sliding windows, haplotypes, genes, functional pathways, and the entire set of SNPs and rare variants taken in aggregate. Despite this variability, the methods were fairly consistent in their ability to identify two associated genes for each simulated trait. The first gene was selected for the largest number of causal alleles and the second for a high‐frequency causal SNP. The presumed model of inheritance and choice of genetic entities are likely to have a strong effect on the outcomes of the analyses. Genet. Epidemiol. 35:S85–S91, 2011. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


A dictionary model for haplotyping, geno
✍ Kristin L. Ayers; Chiara Sabatti; Kenneth Lange 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 182 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract We propose a new method for haplotyping, genotype calling, and association testing based on a dictionary model for haplotypes. In this framework, a haplotype arises as a concatenation of conserved haplotype segments, drawn from a predefined dictionary according to segment specific proba

Comparison of methods and sampling desig
✍ Silviu-Alin Bacanu; Matthew R. Nelson; John C. Whittaker 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 488 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Genome‐wide association studies succeeded in finding genetic variants associated with various phenotypes, but a large portion of the predicted genetic contribution to many traits remains unknown. One plausible explanation is that some missing variation is due to rare variants. Latest se

Power comparisons between similarity-bas
✍ Wan-Yu Lin; Daniel J. Schaid 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 313 KB

## Abstract Recently, a genomic distance‐based regression for multilocus associations was proposed (Wessel and Schork [2006] __Am. J. Hum. Genet.__ 79:792–806) in which either locus or haplotype scoring can be used to measure genetic distance. Although it allows various measures of genomic similari

Case/pseudocontrol analysis in genetic a
✍ Heather J. Cordell; Bryan J. Barratt; David G. Clayton 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 183 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract Estimation and testing of genetic effects (genotype relative risks) are often performed conditionally on parental genotypes, using data from case‐parent trios. This strategy avoids having to estimate nuisance parameters such as parental mating type frequencies, and also avoids generatin