In this study, the authors examined the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory‐3 Correctional scale's sensitivity and specificity at detecting college students' illegal behaviors. Sensitivity was strong, but specificity was weak. Implications for counseling and suggestions for future research ar
Detecting Faking Good and Faking Bad With the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory—3 in a College Student Sample
✍ Scribed by Andrew M. Burck; John M. Laux; Holly Harper; Martin Ritchie
- Publisher
- American Counseling Association
- Year
- 2010
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 104 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1099-0399
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Claims that the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory‐3 (SASSI‐3; F.G. Miller & L.E. Lazowski, 1999) defeats defensiveness have not been independently verified. This study investigates the SASSI‐3's ability to discriminate faking (faking good, problem denial; faking good, claiming extreme virtue; faking bad) from standard answering. Although the results suggest that the Defensiveness scale detects faking, the Subtle Attributes scale was manipulated. These results call into question the SASSI‐3's utility in detecting substance dependence among college students.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES