**Detective Sergeant Barbara Havers and Detective Inspector Thomas Lynley are forced to confront the past as they try to solve a crime that threatens to tear apart the very fabric of a quiet, historic medieval town in England** The cozy, bucolic town of Ludlow is stunned when one of its most rever
Deserved punishment
β Scribed by J. L. A. Garcia
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1989
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 772 KB
- Volume
- 8
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0167-5249
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The essay contrasts the thesis that deserved punishment is punishment which, as deserved, is obligatory with the weaker thesis that it is punishment which, as deserved, is permissible. The author first outlines an account of the meaning of desert-claims which entails only the weaker thesis and then defends this account against criticisms levied in a recent article that it is ambiguous, cannot explain the moral significance of desert, justifies letting people profit from their crimes, and permits unequal treatment. The essay proceeds to a critique of George Sher's view of deserved punishment, faulting Sher for: (1) his reliance on an implausible understanding of benefits, (2) his inability to justify the punishment of crime-victims for their own crimes, and (3) the inadequacy of his defense of mercy. Finally, the author sketches a role-centered conception of morality within which it becomes clearer how deserved punishment can be justified as the victim's ties to the criminal, and the role-responsibilities derivative therefrom, are vitiated by the latter's misdeeds.
THE AMBIGUITY OF DESERT-TALK
In 'Two Concepts of Desert' 1 (hereafter, TCOD) I urged that the notion of personal desert is deeply ambiguous, and that overlooking this ambiguity has hampered our understanding of an important part of the terrain of justice. At its root, I argued, desert is a change in one's normal moral rights, a change deriving from one's service (de servir) or, more generally, as we think today, from what one has done or been. (Hereafter, to simplify things I will speak only of desert based on actions.) The nature of this change, however, varies and is determined by the value of what one has done. The type of change, in turn, determines what sort of thing is deserved and its value. Thus, when I do something bad I can lose or forfeit or vitiate some of my normal '
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
βI donβt think youβre an invalid.β Brennerβs voice was deliberately low, his face inches from hers. He shoved a hand through short blond hair, jaw clenched in suppressed temper. βBut you do need to rest.β βIβm rested.β Dinah was almost screaming, the urge, the need to doβ¦ something, churning in her
"Oslo, 2018. Former long-distance runner Sonja NordstrΓΈm never shows at the launch of her controversial autobiography, Always Number One. When celebrity blogger Emma Ramm visits NordstrΓΈm's home later that day, she finds the door unlocked and signs of a struggle inside. A bib with the number 'one' h