Descriptive analysis of the nature and extent of bullying behavior in a maximum-security prison

✍ Scribed by Carol A. Ireland; Jane L. Ireland

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2000
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 35 KB
• Volume: 26
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0096-140X
• DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2337(2000)26:3<213::aid-ab1>3.0.co;2-z

✦ Synopsis

This aim of this study was to investigate the nature and extent of direct and indirect bullying in a maximum-security prison and to assess prisoners' attitudes toward victims of bullying. A total of 194 adult male prisoners completed the Direct and Indirect Prisoner Behavior Checklist (DIPC) [Ireland (1998): University of Central Lancashire; Ireland (1999a): Aggressive Behavior] and a modified version of the Rigby and Slee [1991: J Social Psychol 131:615-627] provictim scale. The results showed that more than half of the prisoners sampled had been bullied in the past week. Only a small number of prisoners could be classified as either a pure bully or a pure victim, with almost half classified as both a bully and a victim. The most frequent types of bullying used were psychological/verbal and indirect forms. No significant differences were found between pure bullies, bully/victims, pure victims, and the not involved groups' attitudes toward the victims of bullying. These findings hold implications for anti-bullying programs that fail to fully consider the prevalence of indirect forms of bullying and that an individual can be both a bully and a victim.