"In the Socratic Dialogue tradition employed by Plato and by Galileo for examining scientific questions and the suitability of new methods for data collection, this is a challenging contribution. Can we move beyond the discredited introspectionism o
Describing inner experience? : proponent meets skeptic
β Scribed by Hurlburt, Russell T.; Schwitzgebel, Eric
- Publisher
- The MIT Press
- Year
- 2007
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 333
- Series
- Life and mind
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Can conscious experience be described accurately? Can we give reliable accounts of our sensory experiences and pains, our inner speech and imagery, our felt emotions? The question is central not only to our humanistic understanding of who we are but also to the burgeoning scientific field of consciousness studies. The two authors of Describing Inner Experience disagree on the answer: Russell Hurlburt, a psychologist, argues that improved methods of introspective reporting make accurate accounts of inner experience possible; Eric Schwitzgebel, a philosopher, believes that any introspective reporting is inevitably prone to error. In this book the two discuss to what extent it is possible to describe our inner experience accurately.
Hurlburt and Schwitzgebel recruited a subject, "Melanie," to report on her conscious experience using Hurlburt's Descriptive Experience Sampling method (in which the subject is cued by random beeps to describe her conscious experience). The heart of the book is Melanie's accounts, Hurlburt and Schwitzgebel's interviews with her, and their subsequent discussions while studying the transcripts of the interviews. In this way the authors' dispute about the general reliability of introspective reporting is steadily tempered by specific debates about the extent to which Melanie's particular reports are believable. Transcripts and audio files of the interviews will be available on the MIT Press website.
Describing Inner Experience? is not so much a debate as it is a collaboration, with each author seeking to refine his position and to replace partisanship with balanced critical judgment. The result is an illumination of major issues in the study of consciousness -- from two sides at once.
β¦ Table of Contents
Content: 1. Introduction --
2. Can there be a satisfactory introspective method? (Hurlburt) --
3. Descartes inverted (Schwitzgebel) --
4. The first sampling day --
5. The second sampling day --
6. The third sampling day --
7. The fourth sampling day --
8. The fifth sampling day --
9. The sixth sampling day --
10. Eric's reflections (Schwitzgebel) --
11. Russ's reflections (Hurlburt) --
12. Eric's response to Russ, and some parting thoughts (Schwitzgebel).
β¦ Subjects
Consciousness. Introspection. SCIENCE -- Cognitive Science. PSYCHOLOGY -- Cognitive Psychology. Electronic books. Philosophy. Psychological Theory. Bewustzijn. Introspectie. Bewusstsein. Selbstbeobachtung. Philosophie.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Iβve been writing about βskepticismβ (meaning, taking a skeptical stance on pseudo-science, pseudo-philosophy, pseudo-politics, and a few other βpseudosβ) since as far back as 1997, when I began organizing Darwin Day events at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville. From time to time, over the int
<span>Conversations are snapshots of a personβs worldview. You never know when one of those conversations will challenge your Christian faith. Are you equipped to effectively deal with this skepticism? </span><span>Meet the Skeptic</span><span> teaches believers to think about skepticism in categori
<span>Conversations are snapshots of a personβs worldview. You never know when one of those conversations will challenge your Christian faith. Are you equipped to effectively deal with this skepticism? </span><span>Meet the Skeptic</span><span> teaches believers to think about skepticism in categori
"English readers will now be able to appreciate what many consider Bataille's finest work, undoubtedly one of the outstanding texts of modern French writing, just as they will be able to fill a major gap in the history of post-structuralist thought. Whereas Bataille may be the acknowledged forefathe