𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

Descartes: The Probable and the Certain

✍ Scribed by Mark Glouberman


Publisher
Rodopi; KΓΆnigshausen & Neumann
Year
1986
Tongue
English
Leaves
396
Series
ELEMENTA
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Glouberman presents Descartes as trying to establish the distinction between probable and certain knowledge primarily in the wax example. Descartes assumes that there is a necessary connection between the type of cognitive faculty a substance has, and thus between that substance and the type of knowledge that faculty makes attainable. Thus possession of certain rational knowledge is taken to indicate the existence of a spiritual mind. Possession of probable sensible knowledge indicates the presence of a material body. The relation of sensible knowledge to the body is established, but Glouberman argues that Descartes never establishes exactly what pure ideational knowledge of real substances is, nor that having such knowledge necessarily implies that the mind is an autonomous immaterial thinking substance. In the end he finds Cartesian dualism unintelligible. The key problem is that Descartes confuses the contrast of matter and mind with the contrast of the probable and certain because


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Descartes: The Probable and the Certain
✍ Mark Glouberman πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1986 πŸ› Rodopi; KΓΆnigshausen & Neumann 🌐 English

<span>Glouberman presents Descartes as trying to establish the distinction between probable and certain knowledge primarily in the wax example. Descartes assumes that there is a necessary connection between the type of cognitive faculty a substance has, and thus between that substance and the type o

The Probable And The Provable
✍ L. Jonathan Cohen πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1977 πŸ› Oxford University Press, USA 🌐 English

The book was planned and written as a single, sustained argument. But earlier versions of a few parts of it have appeared separately. The object of this book is both to establish the existence of the paradoxes, and also to describe a non-Pascalian concept of probability in terms of which one can ana