Derivation of class II force fields. VI. Carbohydrate compounds and anomeric effects

✍ Scribed by M.-J. Hwang; X. Ni; M. Waldman; C. S. Ewig; A. T. Hagler

• Publisher: Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
• Year: 1998
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 399 KB
• Volume: 45
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0006-3525
• DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0282(199805)45:6<435::aid-bip3>3.0.co;2-q

✦ Synopsis

The methodology for deriving class II force fields has been applied to acetal, hemiacetal, and carbohydrate compounds. A set of eighteen model compounds containing one or more anomeric centers was selected for generating the quantum mechanical energy surface, from which the force field was derived and the functional form assessed. The quality of the fit was tested by comparing the energy surface predicted by the force field with ab initio results. Structural, energetic, and dynamic properties ( vibrational frequencies ) were analyzed. In addition, a and b anomeric equilibrium structures and energies of 2-methoxytetrahydropyran, 2-deoxyribose, and glucose were computed at the HF / 6-31G * and higher ab initio levels. These calculations provide test data from molecules outside the training set used to derive the force field. The quantum calculations were used to assess the ability of the class II force field and two quadratic diagonal ( class I ) force fields, CVFF, and Homans' extension of the AMBER force field, to account for the anomeric effects on the structural and energetic properties of carbohydrate systems. These class I force fields are unable to account for observed structural and energetic trends, exhibiting deviations as large as 5 kcal /mol in relative energies. The class II force field, on the other hand, is shown to reproduce anomeric structural as well as energetic differences. An energy component analysis of this force field shows that the anomeric differences are dominated by torsional energies, although coupling terms, especially angle / torsion, also make significant