Density functional theory of the trapped Fermi gas in the unitary regime
β Scribed by B.P. van Zyl; D.A.W. Hutchinson
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 122 KB
- Volume
- 5
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1612-2011
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
We investigate a density-functional theory (DFT) approach for an unpolarized trapped dilute Fermi gas in the unitary limit. A reformulation of the recent work of T. Papenbrock [1] in the language of fractional exclusion statistics allows us to obtain an estimate of the universal factor, ΞΎ~3D~, in three dimensions (3D), in addition to providing a systematic treatment of finite-N corrections. We show that in 3D, finite-N corrections lead to unphysical values for ΞΎ~3D~, thereby suggesting that a simple DFT applied to a small number of particles may not be suitable in 3D. We then perform an analogous calculation for the two-dimensional (2D) system in the infinite-scattering length regime, and obtain a value of ΞΎ~2D~=1. Owing to the unique properties of the Thomas-Fermi energy density-functional in 2D our result, in contrast to 3D, is exact and therefore requires no finite-N corrections.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
The authors' magnetic field density functional theory is extended to include electron spin-dependent interactions. Coupling the new theory with traditional spin density functional theory in the local limit yields a linear differential equation for the net spin density. The coefficients in the equat
We have recently proposed a simple and systematic approach to the generation of exchange-correlation functionals in density-functional theory by linear least-squares fitting to accurate thermochemical reference data. In a series of four publications, new functionals with gradient corrections of firs
Density functional methods at the 6-31G\* level are applied to the rupture of n-octane into methylαheptyl, ethylαhexyl, propylαpentyl, and butylαbutyl radical fragments. The energetics of the radicals at UMP3, UMP2r6-Ε½ . 31G\*rrUHFr6-31G\* hereafter referred to as UMP , are compared to Ε½ . UB3LYPr6-