How can we create a vital and inclusive pluralistic democracy? Public Deliberation offers answers to this question by showing how democratic theory and democratic practice can be remade to face new challenges. Arguing against the skepticism about democracy that flourishes today on both ends of the p
Democracy as Public Deliberation
โ Scribed by Maurizio Passerin d'Entreves
- Publisher
- Transaction Publishers, Routledge
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 239
- Series
- Perspectives on Democratization
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Table of Contents
Cover
Half Title
Title Page
Copyright Page
Contents
The contributors
1 Introduction: democracy as public deliberation
Normative perspectives
Institutional perspectives
Part I: Normative perspectives
2 Political legitimacy and democratic deliberation
Justice in multicultural societies
Neutrality
Perfectionism
Deliberation
3 Five arguments for deliberative democracy
The process of public deliberation has an educative power
The process of public deliberation has a community-generating power
The procedure of public deliberation improves the fairness of democratic outcomes
Public deliberation contributes constructively to the practical rationality of democratic outcomes
Deliberative democracy elucidates an ideal of democracy that is most congruent with 'who we are'
Conclusion
4 Deliberation, citizenship and identity
Deliberative obligations
Arguments for deliberation
Citizenship and identity
Conclusion
5 Rawls and deliberative democracy
Layered ambiguities: Rawls on public reason
The Rawlsian mirror
The more things change ...
Forward to the origins?
Part II: Institutional perspectives
6 Deliberation and decision making: discontinuity in the two-track model
Deliberative democracy: the basic model
Deliberation and decision making: a two-track model?
Bridging the apparent discontinuity
Augmenting motivational concerns with institutional ones
Conclusion
7 Citizens' juries and deliberative democracy
Towards deliberative institutions
Citizens' juries: innovative deliberative institution?
Inclusivity
Deliberation
Citizenship
Lessons from citizens' juries?
8 Democratic deliberation and cultural rights: the Orange Order march at Drumcree
Deliberative democracy and deep conflict
The threat to political accommodation
Rights as a condition of equal citizenship
A virtual dialogue
Assessing the competing claims
Political legitimacy and cultural expression
9 Is deliberative democracy unfair to disadvantaged groups?
Critiques of deliberative democracy
Inequality in deliberative institutions
Is deliberation biased against disadvantaged groups?
Alternatives to deliberation
Index
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
This text proposes a new kind of democracy for the modern era, one that not only gives citizens more power but also allows them more opportunities to exercise this power thoughtfully. James S. Fishkin here suggests a solution to the problem of inadequate deliberation, in particular within the presid
<div><div> <p style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">This book proposes a new kind of democracy for the modern era, one that not only gives citizens more power but also allows them more opportunities to exercise this power thoughtfully. James S. Fishkin here suggests an innovative solution to the problem of in
<span>Scholars have often claimed that democracies, whatever their virtues, are functionally short-sighted. The evidence is clear: we have been unable to manage many long-term issues including climate change, nuclear waste disposal, natural disaster preparedness, infrastructure maintenance, and budg
<span>Scholars have often claimed that democracies, whatever their virtues, are functionally short-sighted. The evidence is clear: we have been unable to manage many long-term issues including climate change, nuclear waste disposal, natural disaster preparedness, infrastructure maintenance, and budg
Innovative forums that integrate citizen deliberation into policy making are revitalizing democracy in many places around the world. Yet controversy abounds over whether these forums ought to be seen as authentic sources of public opinion and how they should fit with existing political institutions.