## Abstract Cost‐effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs) have become widely used in applied health technology assessment and at the same time are criticized as unreliable decision‐making tool. In this paper we show how using CEACs differs from maximizing expected net benefit (NB) and when it can
Definition, interpretation and calculation of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves
✍ Scribed by Mickael Löthgren; Niklas Zethraeus
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2000
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 98 KB
- Volume
- 9
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1057-9230
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Decision‐making in health care is inevitably undertaken in a context of uncertainty concerning the effectiveness and costs of health care interventions and programmes. One method that has been suggested to represent this uncertainty is the cost‐effectiveness acceptability curve. This te
Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) compares the costs and outcomes of two or more technologies. However, there is no consensus about which measure of effectiveness should be used in each analysis. Clinical researchers have to select an appropriate outcome for their purpose, and this choice can have d