✦ LIBER ✦

Defining multiple criteria for meaningful outcome in routine outcome measurement using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales

✍ Scribed by Parabiaghi, Alberto; Kortrijk, Hans E.; Mulder, Cornelis L.

Book ID: 121564820
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 2013
Tongue: English
Weight: 474 KB
Volume: 49
Category: Article
ISSN: 1433-9285
DOI: 10.1007/s00127-013-0750-7

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Validation of the Health of the Nation O

Validation of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales as a routine measure of outcome in early intervention programmes

✍ Antonio Preti; Alessia Pisano; Maria Teresa Cascio; Federico Galvan; Emiliano Mo 📂 Article 📅 2012 🏛 Wiley (Blackwell Publishing) 🌐 English ⚖ 412 KB

Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for

Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA)

✍ Niels Bilenberg 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 175 KB

The Health of the Nation Outcome Scales

The Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Child & Adolescent Mental Health (HoNOSCA)

✍ Simon Gowers; Sarah J. Bailey-Rogers; Alison Shore; Warren Levine 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 108 KB

Health of the nation outcome scales eval

Health of the nation outcome scales evaluation in a community setting population

✍ Pietro Giorgio Lovaglio, Emiliano Monzani 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 278 KB

The feasibility of routine outcome measu

The feasibility of routine outcome measures in mental health

✍ M. Slade; G. Thornicroft; G. Glover 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 92 KB

Concordance between patients and their c

Concordance between patients and their case managers using the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS)

✍ Tom Trauer; Tom Callaly 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Informa plc 🌐 English ⚖ 95 KB

Objective: Outcome assessment benefits from multiple perspectives, but these may differ. We aimed to compare patient and clinician ratings on respective versions of a well-known outcome assessment scale. Method: Case managers and their patients rated the patient's mental health problems using the