<p>Defining Democracy looks both at the theory of why and the history of how different voting procedures have come to be used β or not, as the case may be β in the three fields of democratic structures: firstly, in decision-making, both in society at large and in the elected chamber; secondly, in el
Defining Democracy: Voting Procedures in Decision-Making, Elections and Governance
β Scribed by Peter Emerson (auth.)
- Publisher
- Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
- Year
- 2012
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 221
- Edition
- 2
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Defining Democracy looks both at the theory of why and the history of how different voting procedures have come to be used β or not, as the case may be β in the three fields of democratic structures: firstly, in decision-making, both in society at large and in the elected chamber; secondly, in elections to and within those chambers; and thirdly, in the various forms of governance, from no-party to multi-party and all-party, which have emerged as a result.
β¦ Table of Contents
Front Matter....Pages i-xxvii
Front Matter....Pages 1-1
The Myths of Majority Rule....Pages 3-24
Pluralist Decision-Making....Pages 25-47
Front Matter....Pages 49-49
Party-ocracies....Pages 51-74
The Candid Candidate....Pages 75-97
Front Matter....Pages 99-99
The Elected Dictator....Pages 101-119
Governance....Pages 121-135
Majoritarianism in Focus....Pages 137-142
The Dictatorsβ Referendums....Pages 143-150
The People Have Spoken....Pages 151-153
Won By One....Pages 155-161
Some Multi-Option Referendums....Pages 163-165
Back Matter....Pages 167-192
β¦ Subjects
Political Science, general; Public Finance & Economics
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
<p>Defining Democracy looks both at the theory of why and the history of how different voting procedures have come to be used β or not, as the case may be β in the three fields of democratic structures: firstly, in decision-making, both in society at large and in the elected chamber; secondly, in el
Voters today often desert a preferred candidate for a more viable second choice to avoid wasting their vote. Likewise, parties to a dispute often find themselves unable to agree on a fair division of contested goods. In Mathematics and Democracy, Steven Brams, a leading authority in the use of mathe
Voters today often desert a preferred candidate for a more viable second choice to avoid wasting their vote. Likewise, parties to a dispute often find themselves unable to agree on a fair division of contested goods. In Mathematics and Democracy, Steven Brams, a leading authority in the use of mathe
<p>Voters today often desert a preferred candidate for a more viable second choice to avoid wasting their vote. Likewise, parties to a dispute often find themselves unable to agree on a fair division of contested goods. In <i>Mathematics and Democracy</i>, Steven Brams, a leading authority in the us