𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

Defeating the Evil-God Challenge: In Defence of God’s Goodness

✍ Scribed by Jack Symes


Publisher
Bloomsbury Publishing
Year
2024
Tongue
English
Leaves
225
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The evil-god challenge is one of the most popular topics in contemporary philosophy of religion. In this landmark text, Jack Symes offers the most detailed examination of the challenge to date. Exploring the nature of god through the leading schools of philosophical theology, Symes argues that it is significantly more reasonable to attribute goodness to god than evil. Drawing from a breadth of ground-breaking material – in metaphysics, ethics, aesthetics and epistemology – Symes claims to defeat the evil-god challenge on behalf of traditional theism. Is it any more reasonable to believe in a good god than an evil god? Not according to proponents of the evil-god challenge. After all, the world contains a significant amount of good and evil for which either god could be held responsible. However, if belief in both gods is equally as reasonable, then religious believers are unjustified in favouring one hypothesis over the other. Therefore, in order to defend their faith, theists must respond to the evil-god challenge: the question of what justifies belief in good god over evil god.

✦ Table of Contents


Cover
Contents
List of Figures
List of Tables
Preface
Acknowledgements
Introduction
Chapter One Constructing the Challenge
Chapter Two The Greatest Conceivable Being
Chapter Three The Bloody Watchmaker
Chapter Four God Revealed
Conclusion
Notes
Bibliography
Index


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Defeating the Evil-God Challenge: In Def
✍ Jack Symes πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2024 πŸ› Bloomsbury Publishing 🌐 English

The evil-god challenge is one of the most popular topics in contemporary philosophy of religion. In this landmark text, Jack Symes offers the most detailed examination of the challenge to date. Exploring the nature of god through the leading schools of philosophical theology, Symes argues that it is

The God Beyond Belief: In Defence of Wil
✍ Nick Trakakis πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English

<P>This study of Professor William Rowe’s defense of atheism on the basis of evil assesses the literature that has developed in response to Rowe’s work, closely examining two strategies: mystery – the idea that God may have reasons beyond our comprehension for permitting evil; and theodicy - explana

The God Beyond Belief: In Defence of Wil
✍ Nick Trakakis (auth.) πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English

<p><P>Why would a loving God who is all-powerful and all-knowing create a world like ours which is marred by all manner of evil, suffering and injustice? This question has come to be known as β€˜the problem of evil’ and has troubled both ordinary folk and specialist philosophers and theologians for ce

God's Goodness and God's Evil
✍ James Kellenberger πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2017 πŸ› Lexington Books 🌐 English

Religious thinkers in the Christian theistic tradition have tried to resolve the problem of evil-how a wholly good and omnipotent God could allow there to be evil-by offering a theodicy. This book considers three traditional theodicies and the objections they have elicited: Leibniz's best of all pos

Defending God: Biblical Responses to the
✍ James L. Crenshaw πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› Oxford University Press, USA 🌐 English

Despite the title, this is not a book of theodicy (a defense of God). This is a book describing theodicies (plural) in the Bible. As another reviewer has noted, this is very similar to what Bart Ehrman tried to do (unsuccessfully in my opinion) in his book "God's Problem." In that book, Ehrman desc

Defending God: Biblical Responses to the
✍ James L. Crenshaw πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2005 πŸ› Oxford University Press, USA 🌐 English

In the ancient Near East, when the gods detected gross impropriety in their ranks, they subjected their own to trial. When mortals suspect their gods of wrongdoing, do they have the right to put them on trial? What lies behind the human endeavor to impose moral standards of behavior on the gods? Is