๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Deductive Generation of Constraint Propagation Rules

โœ Scribed by Sebastian Brand; Eric Monfroy


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
189 KB
Volume
86
Category
Article
ISSN
1571-0661

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Constraint propagation can often be conveniently expressed by rules. In recent years, a number of techniques for automatic generation of rule-based constraint solvers have been developed, most of them using a generate-and-test approach. We examine a generation method that is based on deduction. A solver (i. e., a set of rules) for a complex constraint is obtained from one or several weaker solvers for simple constraints. We describe incremental solver constructions for several types of constraint modifications, including conjunction, existential and universal quantification.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Completion of Rewrite Systems with Membe
โœ H. Comon ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 562 KB

We consider a constrained equational logic where the constraints are membership conditions t โˆˆ s where s is interpreted as a regular tree language. Our logic includes a fragment of second-order equational logic (without projections) where second-order variables range over regular sets of contexts. T

Theory and practice of constraint handli
โœ Thom Frรผhwirth ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 343 KB

Constraint Handling Rules (CHR) are our proposal to allow more ยฏexibility and application-oriented customization of constraint systems. CHR are a declarative language extension especially designed for writing user-deยฎned constraints. CHR are essentially a committedchoice language consisting of multi

IRS ruling affects deduction of performa
โœ Shirley Dennis-Escoffier ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 51 KB

The Internal Revenue Service recently issued a ruling signaling a change in its position affecting the deductibility of performance-based compensation that can be paid to a highly compensated officer when that employee is terminated or retires. The ruling concludes that such compensation does not qu