๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Decision making under uncertainty: Starr's Domain criterion

โœ Scribed by G. O. Schneller; G. P. Sphicas


Publisher
Springer US
Year
1983
Tongue
English
Weight
689 KB
Volume
15
Category
Article
ISSN
0040-5833

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This paper examines a decision making under uncertainty criterion first introduced by Starr, which differs from the classical criteria. The rationale and properties of this criterion, called the Domain criterion, are discussed and compared with the traditional approaches of Wald, Hurwicz, Savage and Laplace. The computational complexity and usefulness of the criterion are discussed, as well as the underlying decision philosophy.

Theory andDec&ion 15 (1983) 321-336. 0040-5833/83/0154-03215()2.40. 9 1983 by D. ReidelPublishing Company.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Techniques for making decisions under un
โœ Fred Gehm ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 550 KB

ommodity trading decisions, like all decisions, must be made under one of C three broad conditions: certainty, risk, or uncertainty. When a decision is made under certainty, the results of all possible actions are known in advance. When a decision is made under risk, the results are not known in adv

Ordinal utility models of decision makin
โœ Charles F. Manski ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1988 ๐Ÿ› Springer US ๐ŸŒ English โš– 992 KB

This paper studies two models of rational behavior under uncertainty whose predictions are invariant under ordinal transformations of utility. The 'quantile utility' model assumes that the agent maximizes some quantile of the distribution of utility. The 'utility mass' model assumes maximization of

On the valuation of alternatives for dec
โœ Ronald R. Yager ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 150 KB

We focus on the problem of decision-making in the face of uncertainty. The issue of the representation of uncertain information is considered and a number of different frameworks are described: possibilistic, probabilistic, belief structures, and graded possibilistic. We suggest methodologies for de