Decision making under risk in Deal or No Deal
β Scribed by Nicolas de Roos; Yianis Sarafidis
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 307 KB
- Volume
- 25
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0883-7252
- DOI
- 10.1002/jae.1110
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
We analyse the choices of 399 contestants in the Australian version of the television game show Deal or No Deal. We calculate risk aversion bounds for each contestant, revealing considerable heterogeneity. We then estimate a structural stochastic choice model that captures the dynamic decision problem faced by contestants. To address individual heterogeneity, we nest the dynamic problem within the settings of both a random effects and a random coefficients probit model. Our structural model produces plausible estimates of risk aversion, confirms the role of individual heterogeneity and suggests that a model of stochastic choice is indeed appropriate. We find mixed evidence of greater risk aversion by females. We also examine generalizations to expected utility theory, finding that the rankβdependent utility model adds nonβnegligible explanatory power and indicates optimism in probability weighting. Finally, we test, but are unable to confirm, the existence of an endowment effect for lotteries. Copyright Β© 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This paper surveys a selection of recent research results which use laboratory methods to contribute to our understanding of risk and uncertainty in environments which are of particular interest to managerial decision-making. The first set of experimental results addresses issues related to insuring