## Abstract In this paper we show that the usual intuitionistic characterization of the decidability of the propositional function __B(x) prop__ [__x : A__], i. e. to require that the predicate (∀__x__ ∈ __A__) (__B(x)__ ∨ ¬ __B(x)__) is provable, is equivalent, when working within the framework of
Decidability and Specker sequences in intuitionistic mathematics
✍ Scribed by Mohammad Ardeshir; Rasoul Ramezanian
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 123 KB
- Volume
- 55
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0044-3050
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
A bounded monotone sequence of reals without a limit is called a Specker sequence. In Russian constructive analysis, Church's Thesis permits the existence of a Specker sequence. In intuitionistic mathematics, Brouwer's Continuity Principle implies it is false that every bounded monotone sequence of real numbers has a limit. We claim that the existence of Specker sequences crucially depends on the properties of intuitionistic decidable sets. We propose a schema (which we call ED) about intuitionistic decidability that asserts “there exists an intuitionistic enumerable set that is not intuitionistic decidable” and show that the existence of a Specker sequence is equivalent to ED. We show that ED is consistent with some certain well known axioms of intuitionistic analysis as Weak Continuity Principle, bar induction, and Kripke Schema. Thus, the assumption of the existence of a Specker sequence is conceivable in intuitionistic analysis. We will also introduce the notion of double Specker sequence and study the existence of them (© 2009 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES