Decay of correlations and the central limit theorem for meromorphic maps
✍ Scribed by Tien-Cuong Dinh; Nessim Sibony
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2006
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 200 KB
- Volume
- 59
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0010-3640
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Let f be a dominant meromorphic self‐map of large topological degree on a compact Kähler manifold. We give a new construction of the equilibrium measure μ of f and prove that μ is exponentially mixing. As a consequence, we get the central limit theorem in particular for Hölder‐continuous observables, but also for noncontinuous observables. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
We prove an L 1 bound on the error made when the Wild summation for solutions of the Boltzmann equation for a gas of Maxwellian molecules is truncated at the n th stage. This gives quantitative control over the only constructive method known for solving the Boltzmann equation. As such, it has recent
The Chung Smirnov law of the iterated logarithm and the Finkelstein functional law of the iterated logarithm for empirical processes are used to establish new results on the central limit theorem, the law of the iterated logarithm, and the strong law of large numbers for L-statistics with certain bo
## Abstract Let {__S~n~__, __n__ ≥ 1} be partial sums of independent identically distributed random variables. The almost sure version of CLT is generalized on the case of randomly indexed sums {__S~Nn~__, __n__ ≥ 1}, where {__N~n~__, __n__ ≥ 1} is a sequence of positive integer‐valued random varia
## Abstract Stochastic geometry models based on a stationary Poisson point process of compact subsets of the Euclidean space are examined. Random measures on ℝ^__d__^, derived from these processes using Hausdorff and projection measures are studied. The central limit theorem is formulated in a way
## Abstract Cost‐effectiveness analyses (CEA) alongside randomised controlled trials commonly estimate incremental net benefits (INB), with 95% confidence intervals, and compute cost‐effectiveness acceptability curves and confidence ellipses. Two alternative non‐parametric methods for estimating IN