๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Debate: Economic and Monetary Union (EMU)


Publisher
Swiss Political Science Association
Year
1996
Tongue
German
Weight
223 KB
Volume
2
Category
Article
ISSN
1420-3529

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


At the European Council meeting in Madrid in December 1995, member states of the European Union agreed on a timetable for organizing an economic and monetary union (EMU). A decision on membership of EMU will be made as early as possible in 1998, and EMU itself will start in January 1999. Final exchange rates between the currencies of participating members will be established and a new European currency, the Euro, will be introduced under the guidance of the European System of Central Banks. Three and a half years later, the Euro is supposed to become the sole currency of the monetary union.

The road toward a single currency is riddled with economic and political problems. One of the trickiest is the relationship between the countries able and willing to join EMU in January 1999, the so-called insiders, and those not joining, the outsiders. Observers agree that the EMU will not exist without a clear agreement on a link between the two groups of countries.

The debate on this link is intense and, at times, even passionate. Given the importance of EMU, the Editors decided to have a debate in the Review by leading European economists. Their articles are drawn from longer papers presented at a conference on "Monetary Coexistence" held in Rome in February 1996 and organized by Francesco Giavazzi and Luigi Spaventa. The articles are based on the likely scenario that the "insiders" will include Germany, France, Finland, Ireland, the Benelux countries, and Austria; whereas the "outsiders" will include the United Kingdom, Denmark, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Sweden, and Greece. Three of the contributions advocate a multilateral solution based on an exchange-rate mechanism, although they differ on the specifics of this solution. The fourth contribution puts forward a sharply different solution, arguing in favor of a generalized system of inflation targeting. The Editors hope that these four articles will spark additional debate on EMU in the pages of the Review.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Debate: Economic and Monetary Union (EMU
๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› Swiss Political Science Association ๐ŸŒ German โš– 140 KB

The most important question about EMU that faces European decision makers is not how to achieve monetary union, 1 but simply this: why do it at all? What is EMU for, and what is it supposed to achieve? Answers to those questions were quite clear in the 1980s. But the end of the Cold War changed dras

Debate: Economic and Monetary Union
๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› Swiss Political Science Association ๐ŸŒ German โš– 186 KB

Uncertainty on the implementation of the third and final stage of economic and monetary union (EMU) in Europe has grown, despite continuing strong public endorsement by decision-makers. Several observers have raised the once taboo issue of a possible delay due to severing problems to meet the conver

Debate:Economic and Monetary Union
๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› Swiss Political Science Association ๐ŸŒ German โš– 130 KB