๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

De Finetti's subjectivism, the assessment of probabilities and the evaluation of evidence: a commentary for forensic scientists

โœ Scribed by F. Taroni; C.G.G. Aitken; P. Garbolino


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
878 KB
Volume
41
Category
Article
ISSN
1355-0306

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This paper presents the historical and philosophical definition of subjective probabilities (also called degree of belief or Bayesian probabilities). It presents a case for the scientist to use subjective probabilities in the process of parameter estimation and evidence evaluation under the Bayesian framework. It is emphasised that Bayesian methodology does not pretend to get the 'true' probabilities: it is an effective method to analyse, criticise, check the 'coherence' of people's opinions, and to help them in revising their opinions in a 'coherent' way.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A generalization of the fundamental theo
โœ Veronica Biazzo; Angelo Gilio ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 175 KB

In this paper, we consider coherent imprecise probability assessments on ยฎnite families of conditional events and we study the problem of their extension. With this aim, we adopt a generalized deยฎnition of coherence, called g-coherence, which is based on a suitable generalization of the coherence pr

Evaluating hazard results for Switzerlan
โœ R.M.W. Musson; G.R. Toro; K.J. Coppersmith; J.J. Bommer; N. Deichmann; H. Bungum ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2005 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 180 KB

The PEGASOS project was a major international seismic hazard study, one of the largest ever conducted anywhere in the world, to assess seismic hazard at four nuclear power plant sites in Switzerland. Before the report of this project has become publicly available, a paper attacking both methodology