✦ LIBER ✦

Cut-Elimination and Quantification in Canonical Systems

✍ Scribed by Anna Zamansky; Arnon Avron

Book ID: 106538882
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Year: 2006
Tongue: English
Weight: 310 KB
Volume: 82
Category: Article
ISSN: 0039-3215
DOI: 10.1007/s11225-006-6611-6

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Indexed systems of sequents and cut-elim

Indexed systems of sequents and cut-elimination

✍ Grigori Mints 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 243 KB

Cut Elimination in ε-Calculi

✍ Mitsuru Yasuhara 📂 Article 📅 1982 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 410 KB

WESSELS considered in [8] cut elimination in a Gentzen-style &-calculus without equality. But MINC pointed out in [6] that the proof in [8] is defective and mentions that the cut elimination theorem in a modified system can be proved model-theoretically. The work in 3 1, perhaps, carries out exactly

Cut Elimination in Transfinite Type Theo

Cut Elimination in Transfinite Type Theory

✍ Kenneth A. Bowen 📂 Article 📅 1973 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 953 KB

Cut Elimination in a Class of Sequent Ca

Cut Elimination in a Class of Sequent Calculi for Pure Type Systems

✍ Francisco Gutiérrez; Blas Ruiz 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 910 KB

Elimination of cut-type rules from the R

Elimination of cut-type rules from the Robinson and Presburger axiomatic systems

✍ A. Yu. Plyushkevichene 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 562 KB

An Addition to “Cut Elimination in ϵ-Cal

An Addition to “Cut Elimination in ϵ-Calculi”

✍ Mitsuru Yasuhara 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 88 KB

A(s) -+ A(&zA(z)), ## HE^) Vz(A(z) ++ B ( z ) ) 4 KIA(%) = ~y B ( y ) . It was pointed out in [3] that HE^) makes this calculus non-conservative over the equality-free part. Namely, some formulas that do not contain equality can be proved only with the help of ( H e 2 ) (cf. also [Z], pp. 83, 84.