๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Cross-validation of MMPI and MMPI-2 predictor scales

โœ Scribed by Arthur L. Aaronson; Oran B. Dent; Christopher D. Kline


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
297 KB
Volume
52
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9762

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


MMPI) or revised Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2) scales, purported to be predictive of treatment outcome, were related to length of stay (LOS) in a domiciliary and to discharge status from a domiciliary for 335 subjects. The revised MacAndrew Alcoholism Scale (MAC-R), Addiction Acknowledgement Scale (AAS), and Addiction Potential Scale (APS), scales indicating a propensity to use illicit substances, and the Psychopathic Deviate Scale (Pd), indicating acting-out, all correlate negatively with length of stay. AAS also correlates negatively with regular/irregular discharge. Other scales expected to predict treatment outcome do not significantly correlate with either length of stay or type of discharge. 0 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.* Dahlstrom, Welch, & Dahlstrom (1975, pp. 171-172) list 159 different studies that focus upon Minnesota Multiphasic Personality (MMPI) scales used to predict treatment outcome. They categorized these studies according to need for treatment, general prognosis for treatment, predicting outcome of hospitalization, predicting response to shock therapy, predicting response to rehabilitation, predicting suitability for group therapy, predicting persistence in treatment regimen, role of therapist characteristics, and patient-therapist dyad studies.

Scarcity of resources in the health and mental health arenas has demonstrated a need for prognostic indicators. The revisors (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989) of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2) noted this need by developing yet another prognostic treatment scale (TRT).

The reliability of MMPI predictor scales may be questionable. At times, various MMPI scales have differentiated well and would seem to have potential as predictors, and, at other times, the same scales have performed poorly (Levitt, 1989). Mauger (1980) noted that the performance of outcome scales was often distorted by pathology, chronicity, the nature of the treatment, and even when the MMPI was administered during the course of treatment.

Most of these scales have not been cross-validated. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a number of scales expected to predict outcome of treatment for their suitability for predicting success of residents enrolled in a domiciliary, an extended care treatment facility for veterans with medical and/or psychiatric problems.

METHOD

Subjects

The subjects were a random sample of veterans in a Department of Veterans Affairs domiciliary. The MMPI-2 was administered after admission to all domiciliary residents who We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Linda A.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Suicide and the MMPI: A cross-validation
โœ Charles G. Watson; William G. Klett; Carol Walters; Patricia Vassar ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 373 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Compared a suicide-completion group to a psychiatric control sample on the 13 traditional MMPI scales, three experimental item pools, and eight profile patterns earlier described as indicative of suicidal tendencies ( N = 84). Also compared the frequencies with which the groups endorsed each of the

The validity of MMPI hostility scales
โœ William G. Shipman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1965 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 423 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views
Concurrent validity of MMPI alcoholism s
โœ Charles C. Rich; Harry G. Davis ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1969 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 161 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views
Validity of five MMPI alcoholism scales
โœ Cooper B. Holmes; David S. Dungan; Timothy P. McLaughlin ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1982 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 303 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views