Comparable groups of British and Ugandan students rated 24 drawings of male and female figures on 12 bipolar scales. The drawings represented figures ranging from extremely obese to extremely anorexic. Multivariate and univariate analyses showed that the major cultural differences occurred with the
Cross-cultural differences in maternal evaluation of children's body shapes
โ Scribed by Hodes, Matthew ;Jones, Cheryl ;Davies, Hugh
- Publisher
- Wiley (John Wiley & Sons)
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 433 KB
- Volume
- 19
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0276-3478
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
Objective: This study investigated cultural variation in mothers' attitudes to children's body shape. Method: One hundred thirty-one mothers from five cultural groups attending a pediatric clinic were approached, and data obtained from 114. Background information was obtained, including weight and height for themselves and their children. Mothers completed the Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26) and rated drawings of children for attractiveness and health, using Likert scales, scored 1-7. Results: Mothers from the different cultural groups had similar body mass index (BMI) and EAT scores, and their children had similar average body weight. However, UK mothers found slimmer girls attractive compared to mothers from South Asia, the Mediterranean or the Caribbean regions, and sub-Saharan Africa (p < .05). The differences occurred within the mid-range (median scores for all ethnic groups 4 5 ) . South Asian mothers presented to the pediatric clinic with more worries about their children not gaining weight and growing (p < .01). Discussion: These findings have implications for understanding cultural variation in the acquisition of attitudes to body shape, and these attitudes influence medical help seeking. 0 1996 by
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Recent research suggests that children's understanding of selfโpresentational behaviourโbehaviour designed to shape social evaluationโis a function of both cognitive and motivational variables. Furthermore, the motivational factors involved are likely to reflect individual differences i
This tension between the value of acknowledging multiple ways of knowing versus forging common agreement about norms or standards of reasoning is a major issue raised, but not resolved, in the book. Others include the following: How do we identify a mode of reasoning? Are these modes distinct and ex