✦ LIBER ✦

Critique of Marinov's experiment: A reply to Wesley

✍ Scribed by S. J. Prokhovnik

Publisher: Springer US
Year: 1980
Tongue: English
Weight: 90 KB
Volume: 10
Category: Article
ISSN: 0015-9018
DOI: 10.1007/bf00708425

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Comments on Prokhovnik's critique of Mar

Comments on Prokhovnik's critique of Marinov's experiment

✍ J. P. Wesley 📂 Article 📅 1980 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 145 KB

The empty ghosts of Michelson and Morley

The empty ghosts of Michelson and Morley: A critique of the Marinov coupled-mirrors experiment

✍ S. J. Prokhovnik 📂 Article 📅 1979 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 689 KB

Russellizing Russell: A reply to his “A

Russellizing Russell: A reply to his “A critique of Lehrer's coherentism”

✍ Mylan Engel 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 507 KB

Reply to “Comment on a simple experiment

Reply to “Comment on a simple experiment to test Bell’s inequality”

✍ J.-M. Vigoureux 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 52 KB

A reply to Haridimos Tsoukas, the radica

A reply to Haridimos Tsoukas, the radical critic of radical critique

✍ Gerald Midgley 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 482 KB

From method to critique: a reply to Vonk

From method to critique: a reply to Vonk and van Vliet

✍ Wolfgang Wagner 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 114 KB

Vonk & van Vliet (1998) criticise the methods used in the study by Wagner, Elejabarrieta & Lahnsteiner (1995). They conclude that methodological ¯aws render some ®ndings of the study invalid. It is shown that those ¯aws are in fact not present and that the remaining part of the conceptual critique i