𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Critique of “Evidence-Based Surgical Hypothesis: The case against BRCA1 and 2 testing”

✍ Scribed by Robert L. Nussbaum

Book ID
113921981
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2012
Tongue
English
Weight
66 KB
Volume
151
Category
Article
ISSN
0039-6060

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The case against BRCA 1 and 2 testing
The case against BRCA 1 and 2 testing
✍ Cheryl Lin; Tina Sasaki; Aaron Strumwasser; Alden Harken 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 271 KB
ENIGMA—Evidence-based network for the in
ENIGMA—Evidence-based network for the interpretation of germline mutant alleles: An international initiative to evaluate risk and clinical significance associated with sequence variation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes
✍ Amanda B. Spurdle; Sue Healey; Andrew Devereau; Frans B. L. Hogervorst; Alvaro N 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 148 KB 👁 2 views

As genetic testing for predisposition to human diseases has become an increasingly common practice in medicine, the need for clear interpretation of the test results is apparent. However, for many disease genes, including the breast cancer susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2, a significant fraction

Validity and power of association testin
Validity and power of association testing in family-based sampling designs: evidence for and against the common wisdom
✍ Stacey Knight; Nicola J. Camp 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 109 KB 👁 1 views

Current common wisdom posits that association analyses using family-based designs have inflated type 1 error rates (if relationships are ignored) and independent controls are more powerful than familial controls. We explore these suppositions. We show theoretically that family-based designs can have