𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Critical review of some theories in fracture mechanics

✍ Scribed by K. B. Broberg


Book ID
104656564
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1968
Tongue
English
Weight
531 KB
Volume
4
Category
Article
ISSN
1573-2673

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Several theories in fracture mechanics apparently approach the problem of crack extension from different points of view but lead to the same main result. Thus, in the case of brittle cracks, an equivalence exists between the Griffith energy criterion, the Barenblatt cohesion modulus theory, and the assumption of a critical mean stress at an end-region of fixed size. It is shown that the feature common to these theories is the adoption (explicitly stated or not) of an autonomous end-region, and that this assumption alone is sufficient for arriving at the principal results.

In the case of brittle materials, the end-region acts as an instability kernel. This region develops into an instable region at a certain load, and crack extension takes place. The instability is clearly associated with the atomic force-distance relations. The interatomic distance thus provides the characteristic length needed to assure the existence of an autonomous end-region.

It is suggested that similar instable end-regions may develop also in non-brittle materials. The characteristic length is here given by different kinds of imperfections.

If no other characteristic length than the dimensions of the crack can be found, then a conclusion must be that the fracture stress is independent of the size of the crack.

In fracture mechanics there are several theories which aim at a rather general description of the fracture process without going much into detail as concems material properties and surrounding conditions. Since the Griffith theory(i) (1920) those theories almost invariably start from the Kolosov-Inglis solution of the stress-strain field surrounding a crack in an elastic medium. In some theories the corresponding dynamic solution is used.

The big difficulty in fracture mechanics is that the fracture process takes place in a small region near the crack-tip and the characteristics of this region cannot be determined by the Kolosov(2)-Inglis(3) solutfton at all. In fact one could, albeit somewhat roughly, define this endregion where the fracture process takes place as the region where the Kolosov-Inglis solution is not applicable. The Kolosov-Inglis solution is therefore useful for the determination of the boundary conditions of the end-region, but a description of the properties of this end-region is necessary for an understanding of the fracture process.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Critical review of some methods in nonli
✍ K.B. Broberg πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1995 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 620 KB

Virtually all methods in fracture mechanics seem to be dependent on the existence of an autonomous region near the crack edge, a region in which the processes are dependent on the material rather than on the body and loading geometry. This, usually tacit, assumption is questionable for very large sc

Strength theories in fracture mechanics
✍ JosΓ©MarΓ­a MΓ­nguez πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1993 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 554 KB

Attstract-The consistency of four strength theories with fracture mechanics is studied by using 6nite element methods. This is carried out by calculating the fracture toughness of a material, as the critical value of the stress intensity factor of a centre-cracked infinite sheet, and checking whethe