CRAMS scale: Field triage of trauma victims
โ Scribed by Stephen P. Gormican
- Book ID
- 104312217
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1982
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 280 KB
- Volume
- 11
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1097-6760
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
trauma, scoring for triage; triage, for trauma
CRAMS Scale: Field Triage of Trauma Victims
A simple IO-point scale was devised for the purpose of determining which trauma patients should go to a trauma center. The acronym "'CRAMS" represents the five components measured: Circulation, Respiration, Abdomen, Motor, and Speech. The results of field triage were compared to final emergency department (ED) disposition. Those patients who died in the ED and those who went directly to the operating room (OR) for general surgery or neurosurgery were defined as major trauma. Of 12 patients defined as major trauma by ED disposition, I1 were defined as major trauma (CRAMS ~ 8) in the field (sensitivity, 92%). This was compared to 8 defined as major trauma by Champion's Trauma Score. Of 313 defined as minor trauma by ED disposition (discharged home), 307 were defined as minor trauma (CRAMS >1 9) in the field (specificity, 98%). The CRAMS scale provides an effective net for major trauma while ensuring that minor trauma is not unnecessarily diverted to a trauma center.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Ineffectiveness of the Trauma Score and the CRAMS Scale for Accurately Triaging Patients to Trauma Centers Both the Trauma Score (TS) and the CRAMS scale have been advocated for field triage of trauma victims to trauma centers. To determine which scale best serves this purpose, both scores were