๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

CRAMS scale: Field triage of trauma victims

โœ Scribed by Stephen P. Gormican


Book ID
104312217
Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1982
Tongue
English
Weight
280 KB
Volume
11
Category
Article
ISSN
1097-6760

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


trauma, scoring for triage; triage, for trauma

CRAMS Scale: Field Triage of Trauma Victims

A simple IO-point scale was devised for the purpose of determining which trauma patients should go to a trauma center. The acronym "'CRAMS" represents the five components measured: Circulation, Respiration, Abdomen, Motor, and Speech. The results of field triage were compared to final emergency department (ED) disposition. Those patients who died in the ED and those who went directly to the operating room (OR) for general surgery or neurosurgery were defined as major trauma. Of 12 patients defined as major trauma by ED disposition, I1 were defined as major trauma (CRAMS ~ 8) in the field (sensitivity, 92%). This was compared to 8 defined as major trauma by Champion's Trauma Score. Of 313 defined as minor trauma by ED disposition (discharged home), 307 were defined as minor trauma (CRAMS >1 9) in the field (specificity, 98%). The CRAMS scale provides an effective net for major trauma while ensuring that minor trauma is not unnecessarily diverted to a trauma center.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Ineffectiveness of the trauma score and
โœ Joseph Ornato; Edward J Mlinek Jr; Edward J Craren; Norman Nelson ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1985 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 356 KB

## Ineffectiveness of the Trauma Score and the CRAMS Scale for Accurately Triaging Patients to Trauma Centers Both the Trauma Score (TS) and the CRAMS scale have been advocated for field triage of trauma victims to trauma centers. To determine which scale best serves this purpose, both scores were