✦ LIBER ✦

C.P.4.08 Screening for mutations in the dynamin 2 gene in Brazilian patients with centronuclear myopathy and Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy

✍ Scribed by K. Sell; L. Yamamoto; F. Velloso; A. Cerqueira; E. Zanoteli; L. Chimelli; F. Kashiwagi; M. Zatz; M. Vainzof

Book ID: 116793246
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2007
Tongue: English
Weight: 62 KB
Volume: 17
Category: Article
ISSN: 0960-8966
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2007.06.398

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Screening for mutations in the periphera

Screening for mutations in the peripheral myelin genes PMP22, MPZ and Cx32 (GJB1) in Russian Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy patients

✍ Irina V. Mersiyanova; Sookhrat M. Ismailov; Alexandr V. Polyakov; Elena L. Dadal 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 255 KB 👁 2 views

## Communicated by Mark Paalman Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) and related inherited peripheral neuropathies, including Dejerine-Sottas syndrome, congenital hypomyelination, and hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP), are caused by mutations in three myelin genes: PMP22,

Mutation analysis of the PMP22, MPZ, EGR

Mutation analysis of the PMP22, MPZ, EGR2, LITAF, and GJB1 genes in Korean patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy type 1

✍ H-K Park; BJ Kim; DH Sung; C-S Ki; J-W Kim 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 244 KB

Screening for mutations in the periphera

Screening for mutations in the peripheral myelin genes PMP22, MPZ and Cx32 (GJB1) in Russian Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy patients; Irina V. Mersiyanova, Sookhrat M. Ismailov, Alexandr V. Polyakov, Elena L. Dadali, Valeriy P. Fedotov, Eva Nelis, Ann Löfgren, Vincent Timmerman, Christine Van Broeckhoven, and Oleg V. Evgrafov (Article was originally published in Human Mutation 15:340–347, 2000)

📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 57 KB 👁 2 views

The authors wish to correct a mistake which occurred in the reporting of one of the mutations. The mutation in Cx32 Met34Lys is wrongly described as 100A>G. The correct description of the mutation should be 101T>A (Met34Lys).