𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Coupled solid phase extraction-supercritical fluid extraction-on-line gas chromatography of explosives from water

✍ Scribed by Slack, Gregory C. ;McNair, Harold M. ;Hawthorne, Steven B. ;Miller, David J.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1993
Tongue
English
Weight
588 KB
Volume
16
Category
Article
ISSN
0935-6304

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

A method has been developed for the quantitative extraction of nitrotoluenes (2,3‐dinitrotoluene, 2,4‐dinitrotoluene and trinitrotolugene) from water using a Bakerbond^TM^ phenyl sorbent. The average solid phase extraction recoveries for spiked standards ranged from 80 to 95 percent for reagent water and 52 to 95 percent from well and surface water in the low ppb and ppt levels. After the nitrotoluenes had been trapped on the solid sorbent they were quantitatively eluted using SFE. Adding toluene to the extraction cell increased the rate of extraction, but did not improve analyte recovery versus unmodified CO~2~. The extracts were analyzed off‐line with GC–ECD using an internal standard. Extraction losses were due to analyte breakthrough, and not from poor SFE recoveries. This demonstrates that supercritical fluid extraction is a suitable elution technique for analytes trapped on solid phase extraction sorbents.

Also, a method for the direct on‐line coupling of SPE to GC, using SFE, has been developed and evaluated. Supercritical CO~2~ is ideal for directly coupling SPE to GC, since carbon dioxide is a gas under ambient conditions. One potential problem of on‐line SPE–SFE–GC is the presence of residual water trapped on the active sites of the Bakerbond^13^ phenyl sorbent. This problem was dealt with by using a split interface previously described by Hawthorne. From the results of this study, the relative standard deviation of the on‐line SPE–SFE–GC interface was determined to be between 4 and 10 percent. In addition, there was no significant difference in the precision of the method with or without the use of an internal standard. A calibration curve was also constructed (r^2^ = 0.995) from spiked controls, demonstrating that the method is quantitative.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Automated on-line solid phase adsorption
✍ Ulrika Ullsten; Karin E. Markides 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 710 KB

## Abstract An automated setup for on‐line solid phase adsorption (SPA)/supercritical fluid extraction (SFE)/supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) was evaluated. Low nanogram amounts of analytes dissolved in ethanol were delivered in the form of injections (≥ 10 μL) to the solid phase adsorbent

Supercritical fluid extraction of pestic
✍ John L. Ezzell; Bruce E. Richter 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 410 KB

## Abstract Solid phase extraction (SPE) was evaluated as a sample pretreatment method prior to supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) of pesticides or phthalate esters from spiked water samples. ODS, Florisil, Tenax GC and XAD4 resin were evaluated for their abilities to retain a mixture of 5 pestic

Fully automated water analyzer based on
✍ Arjan J. H. Louter; Udo A. Th. Brinkman; Rudy T. Ghijsen 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 1004 KB

## Abstract An automated procedure for the analysis of aqueous samples by membrane disk extraction coupled on‐line to capillary gas chromatography (GC) is presented. Organophosphorus pesticides are preconcentrated from aqueous samples on three 0.5 mm thick, 4.0 mm diameter XAD‐2 membrane extraction

Supercritical fluid extraction-capillary
✍ Houben, Robert J. ;Janssen, Hans-Gerd M. ;Leclercq, Piet A. ;Rijks, Jacques A. ; 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 464 KB 👁 1 views

## Abstract A simple and versatile system is described for the on‐line coupling of SFE to capillary GC. The interfacing consists of a programmed temperature vaporizer (PTV) injector. With this injector it is possible to combine solute trapping, elimination of a high flow of extraction fluid, and qu

Comparison of solid-phase extraction and
✍ Silvia R. Sargenti; Harold M. McNair 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 100 KB 👁 2 views

This work compares four different extraction techniques solid-phase Ž . Ž . extraction SPE , supercritical fluid extraction SFE , solid-phase extraction fol-Ž . lowed by supercritical fluid extraction SPErSFE , and liquid᎐liquid extraction Ž .x Ž . LLE for the extraction of 16 polycyclic aromatic h