This note proposes a new solution to the problem based on the information states available to the two opponents. The demon or predictor has two possible states on which to choose his course of action. These states are his predictions of the agents choice. The agent has only one state on which to mak
โฆ LIBER โฆ
Counterfactuals and Newcomb's paradox
โ Scribed by Daniel Hunter; Reed Richter
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Year
- 1978
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 734 KB
- Volume
- 39
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0039-7857
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
Newcomb's paradox
โ
Maurice W. Sasieni
๐
Article
๐
1984
๐
Springer US
๐
English
โ 196 KB
Newcomb's paradox and omniscience
โ
R. Lance Factor
๐
Article
๐
1978
๐
Springer Netherlands
๐
English
โ 506 KB
Newcomb's paradox: A realist resolution
โ
N. Jacobi
๐
Article
๐
1993
๐
Springer US
๐
English
โ 1021 KB
Counterfactuals
โ
David Makinson
๐
Article
๐
1974
๐
Springer Netherlands
๐
English
โ 193 KB
Laws and counterfactuals
โ
Leonard I. Krimerman
๐
Article
๐
1965
๐
Springer Netherlands
๐
English
โ 300 KB
Eells and Jeffrey on Newcomb's problem
โ
Stephen Leeds
๐
Article
๐
1984
๐
Springer Netherlands
๐
English
โ 582 KB
Ellery Eells and Richard Jeffrey have recently proposed solutions to Newcomb's problem within the framework of Jeffrey's Logic of Decision. 1 Both solutions advocate taking two boxes-a course of action I am convinced is the correct one. I am not however convinced that their arguments lead to the Two