๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Counterfactuals and Newcomb's paradox

โœ Scribed by Daniel Hunter; Reed Richter


Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1978
Tongue
English
Weight
734 KB
Volume
39
Category
Article
ISSN
0039-7857

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Newcomb's paradox
โœ Maurice W. Sasieni ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› Springer US ๐ŸŒ English โš– 196 KB

This note proposes a new solution to the problem based on the information states available to the two opponents. The demon or predictor has two possible states on which to choose his course of action. These states are his predictions of the agents choice. The agent has only one state on which to mak

Newcomb's paradox and omniscience
โœ R. Lance Factor ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1978 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 506 KB
Counterfactuals
โœ David Makinson ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1974 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 193 KB
Laws and counterfactuals
โœ Leonard I. Krimerman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1965 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 300 KB
Eells and Jeffrey on Newcomb's problem
โœ Stephen Leeds ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› Springer Netherlands ๐ŸŒ English โš– 582 KB

Ellery Eells and Richard Jeffrey have recently proposed solutions to Newcomb's problem within the framework of Jeffrey's Logic of Decision. 1 Both solutions advocate taking two boxes-a course of action I am convinced is the correct one. I am not however convinced that their arguments lead to the Two