Cost-utility analysis comparing free and pedicled TRAM flap for breast reconstruction

✍ Scribed by Achilleas Thoma; Dana Khuthaila; Gloria Rockwell; Karen Veltri

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2003
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 183 KB
• Volume: 23
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 0738-1085
• DOI: 10.1002/micr.10138

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the free TRAM to the unipedicled TRAM flap in postmastectomy reconstruction, using a cost‐utility analysis. A decision analytic model was used for this study. Medical costs associated with the two techniques were estimated from the Ontario Ministry of Health Schedule of Benefits (1998). Hospital costs were obtained from St. Joseph's Healthcare, a university hospital in Hamilton, Ontario. Utilities were obtained from 33 “experts” across Canada and then converted into quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALYs). The probabilities of various health states associated with unipedicled and free TRAM flaps were obtained by reviewing several key articles. The free TRAM flap was more costly than the unipedicled TRAM flap, but it provided more QALYs. The baseline incremental cost‐utility ratio (ICUR) was $5,113.73/QALY, favoring adoption of the free TRAM flap. This study showed that the free TRAM flap is a cost‐effective procedure for postmastectomy reconstruction in the Canadian healthcare system. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. MICROSURGERY 23:287–295 2003